Resuscitation
-
On the average, 10-15% of patients who undergo cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) following a cardiopulmonary arrest in the hospital environment will survive to be discharged. The purpose of this study was to determine objective factors influencing patient outcome after CPR to determine who should be resuscitated and when to end CPR efforts. The records of 266 patients who underwent in-hospital CPR over a 3-year period were retrospectively analyzed with regard to age, gender, co-morbid conditions, setting of arrest, duration of resuscitation, initial pH and PO2 during resuscitation, and outcome of resuscitative efforts. ⋯ There was no significant difference in survival based on location of arrest. Factors associated with a poor prognosis included age greater than 60, co-morbid disease (i.e. pneumonia, sepsis, renal failure, heart disease, etc.), an initial PO2 < 50 mmHg and CPR efforts extending beyond 10 min. Based on this data, guidelines regarding initiation and termination of CPR should be instituted in light of poor outcome in patients over 60 years of age with co-morbid conditions, specifically after 10 min of CPR.
-
Documentation of profound changes in serum thyroid hormone concentrations associated with cardiac arrest and resuscitation, as well as other acute emergencies, have spurred evaluation of possible therapeutic thyroid hormone administration. Acute and significant, this state, characterized by abnormally low serum thyroid hormone concentrations, may indicate selective thyroid replacement therapy. In a previous investigation, post-resuscitation infusion of levothyroxine sodium (L-T4) to normalize serum 3,5,3'-triiodothyronine (T3) concentrations was associated with significant reduction of neurologic deficit caused by severe global cerebral ischemia. ⋯ In contrast to previous studies using L-T4 infusion, no significant reduction of neurologic deficit was observed. Serum thyroid hormone changes confirmed previously described decreases and in no case did changes in cTSH appear causal in these changes. Thus, we concluded that L-T4 may offer a therapeutic advantage over T3 or rT3.
-
Comparative Study
A comparison of prolonged manual and mechanical external chest compression after cardiac arrest in dogs.
The effects of manual and a new mechanical chest compression device (Heartsaver 2000) during prolonged CPR with respect to haemodynamics and outcome were tested in a prospective, randomized, controlled experimental trial during ventricular fibrillation in 12 dogs of 9-13 kg body weight after 1 min of cardiac arrest. During the first 10 min of CPR the dogs were resuscitated according to the Basic Life Support (BLS) algorithm, followed by 20 min of Advanced Life Support (ALS) algorithm. After 30 min of CPR both manual and mechanical CPR groups were resuscitated following a standardized ALS protocol. ⋯ The CPR trauma score was less in the mechanical group. Mechanical external chest compression provided better haemodynamics than the manual technique, though outcome did not differ. Both optimally performed manual and mechanical techniques produce flow sufficient to maintain organ viability for 30 min of CPR after a 1 min arrest interval.
-
Comparative Study
Comparative assessment of shockable ECG rhythm detection algorithms in automated external defibrillators.
The sensitivity and specificity to ventricular fibrillation (VF) and ventricular tachycardia (VT), classified as requiring immediate DC shock, of four automated external defibrillators (AEDs) and three advisory defibrillators were assessed using the Department of Health Arrhythmia library. This library collected mostly from patients in hospital, includes a wide variety of ECG rhythms including many with additional noise and interference artefact. The library comprised 278 16-s rhythms, 59 of which were VF, 36 were VT requiring cardioversion and 183 were deemed non-shockable. ⋯ All but one of the advisory defibrillators performed similarly. Excluding the artefact rhythms, specificities in the range 79-91% were obtained. All figures stated are at the lower limit of the 95% confidence interval.
-
In an attempt to standardize the teaching and training of active compression-decompression cardiopulmonary resuscitation (ACD-CPR), a group of leading emergency physicians, cardiologists, anesthesiologists, paramedics and nurses with practical, theoretical, educational, and scientific experience in the subject met in June 1995. The group was called The International Working Group of Teaching and Training Active Compression-Decompression CPR. The group was 'born' as a result of the first International Conference of Active Compression-Decompression CPR held in Copenhagen in March 1995. The following paper describes the background, development and text of and ACD-CPR course manual for both students and instructors.