Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
-
Split dose experiments were carried out with two 2 Gy fractions per day at intervals ranging from 0.5 to 24 h, in order to investigate both the time to complete repair and the detailed kinetics of repair of sublethal damage in the cervical spine of rats. ⋯ Two components of repair (0.7 and 3.8 h) have been reported by Ang et al. (Ang, K.K., Jiang, G.L., Guttenberger, R., Thames, H.D., Stephens, L.C., Smith, C.D. and Feng, Y. Impact of spinal cord repair kinetics on the practice of altered fractionation schedules. Radiother. Oncol. 25: 287-294, 1992) in the spinal cord of Sprague-Dawley rats. Two components have also been reported by others more recently. The present results could, with its graphical interpretation, agree in principle, but with a shorter fast component and a longer slow component. A slow component of 5.5 h was reported by Ruifrok et al. (Ruifrok, A.C.C., Kleiboer, B.J. and van der Kogel, A.J. Fractionation sensitivity of rat cervical spinal cord during radiation retreatment. Radiother. Oncol. 25: 295-300, 1992) in a related strain of WAG/Rij rats. The possible presence of a slower component than Ang et al.'s 3.8 h might help to explain the four myelopathies observed in the pilot studies for the CHART clinical trial. The presence of the definite fast component (< 0.5 h) could have important consequences when pulsed brachytherapy is used to replace continuous low dose rate irradiation.
-
Theoretical calculations suggest that pulsed dose-rate irradiation (PDR) should have approximately the same effectiveness as continuous low dose-rate (CLDR) when the same total dose is given in the same overall time, unless large doses per pulse (> 2 Gy) are used and/or non-exponential or very short half-times of repair (< 0.5 h) are present in the irradiated tissues. However, few animal experiments have been reported to test this theory, and some of them gave contradictory results. We have carried out experiments to determine whether PDR irradiation of 18 mm of cervical spinal cord in the rat was more or less effective than CLDR at 0.5-1 Gy/h, when the overall average dose rate during each day of PDR was close to the overall CLDR average dose rate. ⋯ Reasons for this absence of effect with CLDR in these experiments are discussed, the most likely explanation being that a substantial component of repair with very short T1/2 (< 0.5 h) was present in spinal cord of these rats. There is evidence from other experiments elsewhere and in our laboratory for such a fast component of repair.