Radiotherapy and oncology : journal of the European Society for Therapeutic Radiology and Oncology
-
Comparative Study
Automated non-coplanar beam direction optimization improves IMRT in SBRT of liver metastasis.
To investigate whether automatically optimized coplanar, or non-coplanar beam setups improve intensity modulated radiotherapy (IMRT) treatment plans for stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) of liver tumors, compared to a reference equi-angular IMRT plan. ⋯ Compared to an equi-angular beam setup, computer optimized non-coplanar setups do result in substantial improvements in IMRT plans for SBRT of liver tumors.
-
Three-dimensional conformal radiation therapy (3D-CRT) represents an advance in the better delineation of the target contours and more accurate dose distributions. The purpose of this study was to identify local control prognostic factors in patients with locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (LA-NSCLC) treated with 3D-CRT. ⋯ This study shows that local control was independently related to PTV-1 size. The great majority of local recurrences were located in the high-dose region. Dosimetric parameters may contribute to improving radiotherapy results in multidisciplinary treatment for LA-NSCLC.
-
To evaluate the efficacy of dose-individualized stereotactic body radiotherapy (SBRT) and adjuvant chemotherapy in stage T1-3N0M0 non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). ⋯ Patients treated with the dose-individualization strategy of SBRT showed excellent local control and improved survival. Adjuvant chemotherapy may reduce the frequency of relapse and increase overall survival in stage at T1-3N0M0 NSCLC patients.
-
Outcome after radiochemotherapy (RCHT) with temozolomide (TMZ) versus radiotherapy (RT) for WHO grade III astrocytic tumors was evaluated. No significant difference in overall survival or progression-free survival between both groups was calculated. RCHT seems not to result in an improved outcome. Further randomized studies are needed to support these results.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial
A randomized comparison of interfraction and intrafraction prostate motion with and without abdominal compression.
To quantify inter- and intrafraction prostate motion in a standard VacLok (VL) immobilization device or in the BodyFix (BF) system incorporating a compression element which may reduce abdominal movement. ⋯ Intrafraction motion became the major source of error during radiotherapy after online correction of interfraction prostate motion. The addition of 120 mbar abdominal compression to custom pelvic immobilization influenced neither interfraction nor intrafraction prostate motion.