European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Lignocaine plus morphine in bolus patient-controlled intravenous analgesia lacks post-operative morphine-sparing effect.
Lignocaine has been used successfully to treat burn pain and neuropathic pain. We have conducted a randomized, double-blind trial to assess the morphine-sparing effect of intravenous lignocaine in patients with acute pain. After major abdominal surgery, patients were treated with post-operative patient-controlled intravenous analgesia in two groups: group M (n = 25, morphine 0.2 mg mL-1) and group ML (n = 25, morphine 0.2 mg mL-1 plus lignocaine 3.2 mg mL-1). ⋯ However, the sedation scores in group ML patients during the first post-operative day were significantly greater than those in group M. The incidence of lignocaine-related lightheadedness and dry mouth was also significantly greater in group ML than in group M. It was concluded that the addition of lignocaine 3.2 mg mL-1 to morphine 0.2 mg mL-1 given via patient-controlled analgesia system does not provide a post-operative morphine-sparing analgesic effect.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Accelographic and mechanical post-tetanic count and train-of-four ratio assessed at the great toe.
We examined post-tetanic count (PTC) and train-of-four (TOF) ratios at the great toe assessed accelographically or mechanically and compared these with post-tetanic count and train-of-four ratios evaluated mechanically at the thumb in 24 patients who were given vecuronium. An acceleration transducer was attached to the right great toe, a force transducer to the left great toe and another force transducer to the thumb of the left hand. In the PTC group (n = 12) and TOF group (n = 12), post-tetanic count and train-of-four ratios were simultaneously recorded using the two great toes and the thumb of the left hand respectively. ⋯ In conclusion, the mechanical post-tetanic count at the great toe is lower than the mechanical post-tetanic count at the thumb. In contrast, mechanical train-of-four ratios at the great toe are greater than the mechanical train-of-four at the thumb. Nevertheless, as the mechanical train-of-four ratios at the great toe became comparable with the mechanical train-of-four ratios at the thumb, mechanical assessment of the train-of-four ratio at the great toe may be useful for the evaluation of residual neuromuscular block.
-
We aimed to determine whether our results were any better or worse than other published reports and to examine the efficacy of the West Midlands Ambulance Service (WMAS) policy of applying cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) and manual ventilation to all unwitnessed cardiac arrests in preference to immediate defibrillation. All cardiac arrests were studied from October 1994 to September 1996. In all unwitnessed arrests, crews undertook CPR and manually ventilated the lungs via a mask or an endotracheal tube with a bag and valve or a mechanical resuscitator using an FIO2 of 1 or 0.21 for at least 2 min before defibrillation was attempted. ⋯ The European Resuscitation Council Guidelines recommending immediate defibrillation for unwitnessed arrests are not supported by these results. The apparent lack of cerebral damage and the percentage success suggests that resuscitation considerations should be as brain orientated as they are heart orientated. The elapsed time periods reported challenge several shibboleths.
-
Letter Case Reports
Forestier disease and interscalene brachial plexus block.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Tropisetron or ondansetron compared with placebo for prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting.
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled, multicentre study, the efficacy of prophylactic tropisetron (2 mg) or ondansetron (4 mg) for the prevention of post-operative nausea and vomiting after abdominal or non-abdominal surgery with general balanced anaesthesia was studied in 842 ASA I-III patients. In patients undergoing abdominal surgery, ondansetron and tropisetron reduced the frequency of emetic episodes compared with the placebo (29%, 30% vs. 42% respectively). ⋯ However, neither tropisetron nor ondansetron was significantly different from the placebo in this patient subgroup. In conclusion, for patients at increased risk of post-operative nausea and vomiting, a prophylactic therapy at the lowest effective dose with tropisetron or ondansetron may be useful.