European journal of anaesthesiology
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison of the effects on postoperative pain relief of epidural analgesia started before or after surgery.
In a randomized, prospective clinical study pain relief and pulmonary function were compared after upper abdominal surgery when thoracic epidural analgesia was instituted either before or after surgery. Twenty-six patients admitted for surgery to treat gastro-oesophageal reflux received thoracic epidural analgesia as an adjunct to general anaesthesia either before or after surgery. Twelve patients received epidural mepivacaine 20 mg mL(-1) and morphine perioperatively. ⋯ No intergroup differences were found regarding pain at rest and mobilization. The requirement for additional analgesics was similar in both groups as well as peak expiratory flow. Thoracic epidural analgesia that had already been induced before surgery, and was continued into the postoperative period, does not seem to add any advantage regarding pain relief and lung function compared with thoracic epidural analgesia instituted in the immediate postoperative period.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Does etomidate increase postoperative nausea? A double-blind controlled comparison of etomidate in lipid emulsion with propofol for balanced anaesthesia.
In a double-blind randomized study, the incidence and severity of postoperative nausea and vomiting was investigated with a new formulation of etomidate (Etomidate-(R)Lipuro, B. Braun Melsungen AG, Germany) compared with propofol for induction of a balanced anaesthesia with isoflurane/fentanyl in air. The incidence and intensity of nausea was examined by use of a visual analogue scale (VAS; 0-100 mm) at 1, 2, between 6 and 8, and 24 h postoperatively. ⋯ The median rating for nausea remained below 5 mm at any time in both groups, i.e. the intensity of nausea was very low. The incidence of vomiting was higher in women receiving etomidate (26.8% vs. 10%). We conclude that etomidate does not increase nausea during the early postoperative period.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Efficacy of prophylactic droperidol, ondansetron or both in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting in major gynaecological surgery. A prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial.
We conducted a prospective, randomized, double-blind clinical trial comparing droperidol 1.25 mg intravenously (i.v.) (group 1, n = 30), ondansetron 4 mg i.v. (group 2, n = 30), or both (group 3, n = 30) in the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting (PONV) in the first 24 h following major gynaecological procedures under combined general and epidural anaesthesia. PONV was analysed by a linear nausea/vomiting score, incidence of nausea and vomiting, and the need for antiemetic rescue. ⋯ A trend persisted up to the fourth hour but was not statistically significant in either group. In conclusion, droperidol and ondansetron are effective agents in the prevention of PONV, and their combination seems to provide slightly better results than either drug alone.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Itching after intrathecal morphine. Incidence and treatment.
This study was designed to determine whether low doses of intrathecal morphine still result in itching and it evaluates the outcome of a standardized treatment using promethazine and - for intractable itch - naloxone. Patients (n = 143) scheduled for total hip surgery were allocated to four groups (in a double blind manner) with bupivacaine 20 mg in 4 mL but different doses of intrathecal morphine: Group I, 0.025 mg, Group II, 0.05 mg, Group III, 0.1 mg and Group IV, 0.2 mg. The presence or absence of itching was noted every three hours for a 24-h period. ⋯ Only in group IV there was a single patient who needed naloxone to treat itching. The incidence and severity of itching is a dose-related side-effect in the dose range of 0.025-0.2 mg of intrathecal morphine. Itching still occurs after the low doses of intrathecal morphine, but symptoms vanish after promethazine 25 mg intramuscularly.
-
Arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure measurements using the NBP-75 microstream capnometer were compared with direct PaCO2 values in patients who were (a) not intubated and spontaneously breathing, and (b) patients receiving intermittent positive pressure ventilation of the lungs and endotracheal anaesthesia. Twenty ASA physical status I-III patients, undergoing general anaesthesia for orthopaedic or vascular surgery were included in a prospective crossover study. After a 20-min equilibration period following the induction of general anaesthesia, arterial blood was drawn from an indwelling radial catheter, while the end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure was measured at the angle between the tracheal tube and the ventilation circuit using a microstream capnometer (NBP-75, Nellcor Puritan Bennett, Plesanton, CA, USA) with an aspiration flow rate of 30 mL min(-1). ⋯ A good correlation between arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure was observed both during mechanical ventilation (r = 0.59; P = 0.0005) and spontaneous breathing (r = 0.41; P = 0.001); while no differences in the arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension difference were observed when patients were intubated and mechanically ventilated (7. 3 +/- 4 mmHg; CI95: 6.3-8.4) compared to values measured during spontaneous breathing in the postanesthesia care unit, after patients had been awakened and extubated (6.5 +/- 4.8 mmHg; CI95: 5. 2-7.8) (P = 0.311). The mean difference between the arterial to end-tidal carbon dioxide tension gradient measured in intubated and non-intubated spontaneously breathing patients was 1 +/- 6 mmHg (CI95: -11-+13). We conclude that measuring the end-tidal carbon dioxide partial pressure through a nasal cannula using the NBP-75 microstream capnometer provides an estimation of arterial carbon dioxide partial pressure similar to that provided when the same patients are intubated and mechanically ventilated.