Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2003
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialCryoprecipitate for the correction of coagulopathy associated with liver disease.
In patients with liver disease at risk of pulmonary oedema, cryoprecipitate (small volume) might be a viable alternative to fresh frozen plasma (FFP, large volume) in the correction of coagulopathy. However, the efficacy of cryoprecipitate in these patients has not been tested. We evaluated the role of cryoprecipitate in the correction of the coagulopathy of liver disease. ⋯ Cryoprecipitate improves the coagulopathy of liver disease. Four units of FFP are more efficacious than five units of cryoprecipitate. Cryoprecipitate may have a role in correction of the coagulopathy associated with liver disease where concerns about pulmonary oedema exist.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2003
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialSimulated epidural test doses using adrenaline and adrenaline/clonidine in sevoflurane-anaesthetized children.
A pilot study was conducted using a simulated epidural test dose to ascertain the effects adrenaline, adrenaline/clonidine mixture, and clonidine alone on the accepted criteria for determining the occurrence of an epidural intravascular injection. Seventy-five ASA 1 or 2 children aged from six months to twelve years were sequentially allocated to one of three groups: group A: adrenaline 0.5 microgram/kg, group AC: adrenaline 0.5 microgram/kg and clonidine 0.3 microgram/kg, and group C: clonidine 0.3 microgram/kg. Effects on heart rate, T-wave amplitude and systolic blood pressure were determined after induction of anaesthesia and stabilization using sevoflurane in nitrous oxide and oxygen. ⋯ There were no significant differences between groups A and AC for any parameter. Negative predictive value estimates for the current criteria for intravascular injection were low. Clonidine 0.3 microgram/kg produced no effects on the study variables.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2003
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical TrialPropofol alone, sevoflurane alone, and combined propofol-sevoflurane anaesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy.
Electroconvulsive therapy is an effective treatment for severe and medication-resistant depression. There have been no reports describing how a volatile anaesthetic affects haemodynamic responses, seizure duration, and recovery characteristics during electroconvulsive therapy. We carried out a repeated-measure crossover study to compare the effects on haemodynamic responses, seizure duration, and recovery characteristics of the following types of anaesthesia in electroconvulsive therapy: propofol alone, sevoflurane alone, and propofol combined with sevoflurane. ⋯ Sevoflurane anaesthesia alone is most disadvantageous in terms of haemodynamics. Propofol-sevoflurane anaesthesia is advantageous in terms of haemodynamics, but disadvantageous in terms of seizure duration and recovery time. Propofol alone is most advantageous in terms of seizure duration.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2003
Comparative StudyComparison between tube compensation and pressure support ventilation techniques on respiratory mechanics.
In the intubated patient, the presence of an endotracheal tube increases the work of breathing during spontaneous breathing. The tube compensation technique was developed as a new ventilator mode that can compensate for that additional the work of breathing. We investigated the respiratory parameters during the pressure support ventilation 0, 5, 10 cmH2O and tube compensation 100% modes of the Puritan Bennett 840 ventilator in ten postoperative patients who had undergone radical surgery for oesophageal cancer. ⋯ The duty ratio of pressure support ventilation 10 cmH2O was significantly smaller than the other three modes. There was no significant difference in the duty ratio and rapid shallow breathing index between pressure support ventilation 5 cmH2O and tube compensation 100%. It was concluded that the assist levels of pressure support ventilation 5 cmH2O and tube compensation 100% were almost equal for clinical purposes.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Aug 2003
Patient-controlled epidural analgesia: a prospective audit of epidural pethidine 4 mg/ml and ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml.
A prospective audit of one hundred and forty-seven (147) Acute Pain Service (APS) patients, who received postoperative patient-controlled epidural analgesia (PCEA) using pethidine 4 mg/ml or ropivacaine 0.2% with fentanyl 2 micrograms/ml in general surgical or orthopaedic wards over a twelve-month period, is presented. Data were collected from APS observation charts over a 48-hour period postoperatively. We found no significant difference in postoperative analgesia or side-effects between pethidine and ropivacaine with fentanyl in orthopaedic or general surgical patients.