Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · May 2010
Comparative StudyTight glucose control versus intermediate glucose control: a quasi-experimental study.
Intensive insulin treatment is associated with an increased risk of hypoglycaemia. The purpose of this study was to evaluate two different strategies: tight glucose control (TGC) versus intermediate glucose control (IGC). In this quasi-experimental study, 130 critically ill patients were assigned to receive either the TGC protocol (n=65), according to which blood glucose levels were maintained between 4.4 and 6.1 mmol/l, or the IGC protocol (n=65), according to which blood glucose levels were maintained between 4.4 and 8.0 mmol/l. ⋯ Mechanical ventilation (odds ratio 4.33, CI 1.16 to 16.13), medical illness (odds ratio 2.88, CI 1.20 to 6.99) and hypoglycaemia (< 3.3 mmol/l) (odds ratio 299, CI 1.21 to 7.41) were independent factors associated with mortality. TGC is difficult to accomplish in routine intensive care unit settings and is associated with a significant increase in the incidence of hypoglycaemia. Hypoglycaemia < 3.3 mmol/l is an independent risk factor for in-hospital mortality.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · May 2010
Rapid reversal of coagulopathy in warfarin-related intracranial haemorrhages with prothrombin complex concentrates.
We report our initial experience using Profilnine SD, a 3-Factor prothrombin complex concentrate (PCC) in combination with fresh frozen plasma and vitamin K in seven patients admitted to our neurointensive care unit with oral anticoagulation therapy-related intracranial haemorrhage over a six-month period, to achieve rapid normalisation of the international normalised ratio (INR) and allow surgical evacuation when indicated. Four patients presented with subdural haematomas while three had intracerebral haematomas. Six of seven patients had admission INR in the appropriate therapeutic range for oral anticoagulation therapy. ⋯ Two of the three patients who died had haematoma increase, worsening midline shift and subfalcine herniation, leading to withdrawal of therapy. Prothrombin complex concentrates should be considered for use in the urgent reversal of INR in oral anticoagulation therapy-related intracranial haemorrhage, potentially halting haematoma expansion and expediting urgent neurosurgical intervention, although data from randomised controlled trials is still lacking. The literature supporting the use of PCC is reviewed and a protocolised emergent treatment algorithm is proposed, which may help achieve earlier consistent normalisation of the INR.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · May 2010
The financial and environmental costs of reusable and single-use plastic anaesthetic drug trays.
We modelled the financial and environmental costs of two commonly used anaesthetic plastic drug trays. We proposed that, compared with single-use trays, reusable trays are less expensive, consume less water and produce less carbon dioxide, and that routinely adding cotton and paper increases financial and environmental costs. ⋯ Production of CO2 was 110 g CO2 (95% CI 98 to 122 g CO2) for the reusable tray, 126 g (95% CI 104 to 151 g) for single-use trays alone (mean difference of 16 g, 95% CI -8 to 40 g) and 204 g CO2 (95% CI 166 to 268 g CO2) for the single-use trays with cotton and paper Water use was 3.1 l (95% CI 2.5 to 3.7 l) for the reusable tray, 10.4 l (95% CI 8.2 to 12.7 l) for the single-use tray and 26.7 l (95% CI 20.5 to 35.4 l) for the single-use tray with cotton and paper Compared with reusable plastic trays, single-use trays alone cost twice as much, produced 15% more CO2 and consumed three times the amount of water Packaging cotton gauze and paper with single-use trays markedly increased the financial, energy and water costs. On both financial and environmental grounds it appears difficult to justify the use of single-use drug trays.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · May 2010
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative StudyAnti-emetic effect of midazolam added to morphine patient-controlled analgesia after total abdominal hysterectomy.
Nausea and vomiting are frequent adverse effects of patient-controlled analgesia with opioids. This study was designed to compare the effect of midazolam to that of ondansetron for prevention of nausea and vomiting during morphine patient-controlled analgesia. In a randomised, double-blind, prospective trial, 90 patients were allocated to one of three groups of 30 each, to receive one of three patient-controlled analgesia regimens to manage postoperative pain: a combination of midazolam and morphine (group M), a mixture of ondansetron and morphine (group O) or morphine alone (group C). ⋯ The frequency of nausea and vomiting was significantly lower in groups M (27%) and O (37%) compared with group C (70%) (P < 0.05). The incidence of mild sedation in group M was significantly higher than that in groups O or C (P < 0.05). We conclude that midazolam is as effective as ondansetron in preventing opioid-induced nausea and vomiting following total abdominal hysterectomy and has acceptable side-effects.