Anaesthesia and intensive care
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2015
Historical ArticleThe development of laryngoscopes for anaesthesia.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2015
ReviewSugammadex: what do we know and what do we still need to know? A review of the recent (2013 to 2014) literature.
Since its launch in 2008, sugammadex has been considered one of the most significant developments in anaesthesia-related pharmacology. With almost 500 sugammadex-related publications and over nine million patient exposures worldwide, user experience and scientific data have grown exponentially. However, several important questions are yet to be answered. This article reviews the sugammadex-related literature in 2013 and 2014 to determine which of these questions have been answered more fully over the last 18 months and which questions require more information and research.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2015
Multicenter StudyComplications of intra-aortic balloon pump use: does the final position of the IABP tip matter?
We report results of a retrospective review of intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) use in two Australasian centres and evaluate the effect of final IABP tip position on outcome. Indications for counterpulsation, patient demographics and in-hospital outcomes and complications were retrospectively collected. The chest X-ray reports provided the 'final' position of the IABP tip. ⋯ Severe renal impairment was the most common complication (16.6%), and second, severe catheter dysfunction (5.4%). ?Final IABP position was acceptable in 39.9%, malpositioned in 11.1%,?severely malpositioned in 6.7% and unavailable for 42.4%. Logistic regression analysis showed IABP tip malposition (compared with satisfactory position odds ratio=3.9 [95% confidence interval=2.0-7.6, P < 0.001] and severely malpositioned odds ratio=13.0 [95% confidence interval 5.3-31.7, P < 0.001]) was associated with major complications more than the presence of shock (odds ratio=3.8, confidence interval=2.1-6.8 P < 0.001). The acceptance of a less-than-ideal final position was highly predictive of morbidity directly related to IABP device therapy.
-
Anaesth Intensive Care · Jan 2015
Randomized Controlled TrialEffect of different phenylephrine bolus doses for treatment of hypotension during spinal anaesthesia in patients undergoing elective caesarean section.
The efficacy of phenylephrine might be improved by giving doses higher than that traditionally used (100 µg). This study compared the effects of three initial bolus doses of intravenous phenylephrine; 100 µg (group P100), 125 µg (group P125) and 150 µg (group P150), for the treatment of post-spinal hypotension in patients undergoing elective caesarean delivery. If hypotension was not corrected by this dose, additional boluses of 25 µg were given every minute. ⋯ Although systolic blood pressure was higher at certain time-points after 150 µg phenylephrine, there were no statistically significant differences in the effectiveness of the first bolus of phenylephrine to treat hypotension (85%, 95% and 95% in groups P100, P125 and P150, respectively, P=0.215); the additional dose of phenylephrine after the first bolus (P=0.810); the number of additional boluses (P=0.318) or of hypotensive episodes (P=0.118). There were no significant differences in the number of patients developing reactive hypertension or bradycardia, in maternal side-effects or in neonatal outcomes. Although the study may have been underpowered, initial phenylephrine bolus doses of 100 µg, 125 µg and 150 µg did not significantly differ in efficacy to treat post-spinal hypotension in these patients.