The Clinical journal of pain
-
Meta Analysis
Percutaneous Electrical Stimulation Improves Chronic Knee Pain and Function. A Systematic Review and Meta-analyses.
The aim of this systematic review and meta-analysis was to evaluate the effectiveness of percutaneous electrical stimulation in the modulation of pain and its implication in the function of patients with a painful knee condition. ⋯ This review showed a positive effect of applying the percutaneous electrical stimulation for reducing pain and improving function in adults with a painful knee.
-
Both superficial and deep serratus anterior plane (SAP) blocks are effective for anterior chest wall surgeries, but there is little clarity on which is more effective. Hence, we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) to evaluate the comparative efficacy of the 2 approaches for SAP block after anterior chest wall surgery. ⋯ Current evidence does not support the preference for one approach of SAP block over the other for postoperative pain. Based on the available data, we recommend further future trials to determine any differences between these interventions.
-
Meta Analysis
Genicular Nerve Block for Knee Osteoarthritis: A Systematic Review and meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.
Genicular nerve block (GNB) has emerged as a novel nonsurgical therapy for symptomatic knee osteoarthritis (KOA). The objective was to evaluate GNB versus placebo and other intra-articular (IA) therapies. ⋯ Although, GNB achieved the MCID for KOA pain and statistically significant results for knee functions. We cannot recommend its routine use besides being a safe procedure so far, evidence is fair on GNB for primary KOA due to study heterogeneity and limited follow-up.
-
Meta Analysis
Network Meta-analysis and Economic Evaluation of Neurostimulation Interventions for Chronic Non-surgical Refractory back Pain.
Different types of spinal cord stimulation (SCS) have been evaluated for the management of chronic nonsurgical refractory back pain (NSRBP). A direct comparison between the different types of SCS or between closed-loop SCS with conventional medical management (CMM) for patients with NSRBP has not been previously conducted, and therefore, their relative effectiveness and cost-effectiveness remain unknown. The aim of this study was to perform a systematic review, network meta-analysis (NMA) and economic evaluation of closed-loop SCS compared with fixed-output SCS and CMM for patients with NSRBP. ⋯ Current evidence showed that closed-loop and fixed-output SCS provide more benefits and cost-savings compared with CMM for patients with NSRBP.
-
The aim of our meta-analysis was to systematically assess the enduring effectiveness and safety of high-frequency spinal stimulation (HF-SCS) in the management of chronic pain. ⋯ The findings from our comprehensive review and meta-analysis offer encouraging data about the prolonged efficacy and safety of HF-SCS in chronic pain management on some but not all outcomes. Recognizing the constraints of the existing evidence is crucial. Additional clinical trials, meticulously planned and stringent, are essential to bolster the current body of evidence and reach more conclusive findings.