Pediatric emergency care
-
Pediatric emergency care · Apr 2002
Comparative StudyColor Doppler sonography and scintigraphy of the testis: a prospective, comparative analysis in children with acute scrotal pain.
To compare testicular color Doppler sonography with testicular scintigraphy in differentiating between surgical and nonsurgical conditions of the pediatric testis, and to evaluate the role of testicular color Doppler sonography in the pediatric population. ⋯ Color Doppler sonography and scintigraphy show similar sensitivity for the diagnosis of testicular torsion. A small number of false-negative cases can occur with either modality. The two studies may provide complementary information in indeterminate cases.
-
Pediatric emergency care · Apr 2002
Assessment of pediatric patients by emergency medical technicians-basic.
To determine whether emergency medical technicians-basic can accurately assess children and whether this ability varies with the patient's age or diagnosis. This determination is important for educational program design for emergency medical technicians in pediatrics and for evaluation of the possibility of expanding their scope of practice. ⋯ Emergency medical technicians-basic were highly successful in assessing children with wheezing, serious illness, injuries, and psychologic and social conditions. Consideration should be given to expanding their scope of practice in these areas. They were less successful in assessing minor medical conditions and respiratory emergencies other than wheezing. They require additional training in these areas.
-
Pediatric emergency care · Apr 2002
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical TrialComparison of two benzodiazepines used for sedation of children undergoing suturing of a laceration in an emergency department.
(1) To determine if oral diazepam (POD) is as effective in sedating children less than 6 years of age for laceration repair as oral midazolam (POM) or intranasal midazolam (INM); and (2) To determine if patients stayed longer in the department after sedation when given POD for sedation. ⋯ The oral route of delivery of POM and POD was better tolerated than INM. POM and INM were more effective at sedation than POD, but there was no clinical difference between any groups for time to sedation or time to discharge. More patients in the POM group had side effects after leaving the department. POD may be an alternative to POM, but a higher dose may be required, possibly with longer recovery times.