Journal of general internal medicine
-
Comparative Study
Reducing unnecessary coronary care unit admissions: a comparison of three decision aids.
To determine whether published decision rules for ischemic heart disease have practical value in reducing unnecessary admissions to coronary care units. ⋯ None of the decision aids could reduce unnecessary admissions without seriously increasing the rate of inappropriate discharges. However, within the clinically relevant subgroup of patients for whom the decision to admit or discharge was not obvious on clinical grounds (those without complications on presentation whom the residents chose not to discharge), the decision aids examined, used in combination to verify the need for admission, might have safely averted some unnecessary admissions.
-
To determine whether transferring the care of patients to another senior resident the day after admission to the hospital adversely affects the efficiency and quality of care. ⋯ Patients transferred to a different resident the day after admission had more laboratory tests performed and longer inpatient stays.