Journal of general internal medicine
-
To identify what factors men consider important when choosing treatment for prostate cancer, and to assess why men reject watchful waiting as a treatment option. ⋯ In discussing treatment options for localized prostate cancer, clinicians, including primary care providers, should recognize that patients' decisions are often based on specific beliefs regarding each therapy's intrinsic characteristics, supporting evidence, or pattern of complications. Even if patients do not recall a physician recommendation against watchful waiting, this option may not be chosen because of fear of future consequences.
-
Clinical Trial Controlled Clinical Trial
Teaching residents evidence-based medicine skills: a controlled trial of effectiveness and assessment of durability.
To measure the effectiveness of an educational intervention designed to teach residents four essential evidence-based medicine (EBM) skills: question formulation, literature searching, understanding quantitative outcomes, and critical appraisal. ⋯ A brief structured educational intervention produced substantial and durable improvements in residents' cognitive and technical EBM skills.
-
The American Board of Internal Medicine (ABIM) has recommended a specific number of procedures be done as a minimum standard for ensuring competence in various medical procedures. These minimum standards were determined by consensus of an expert panel and may not reflect actual procedural comfort or competence. ⋯ Minimum standards for certifying internal medicine residents may need to be reexamined in light of house officer comfort level performing selected procedures.
-
To examine the impact of housing status on health service utilization patterns in low-income HIV-infected adults. ⋯ Our study documents differences in health care utilization patterns across stably housed, doubled-up, and homeless HIV-infected persons after controlling for health insurance coverage. These differences, especially those pertaining to outpatient services, suggest that the unstably housed may be receiving less adequate health care than the stably housed, and hence may be more likely to experience adverse clinical outcomes.