Journal of general internal medicine
-
Comparative Study
Selecting the best clinical vignettes for academic meetings: should the scoring tool criteria be modified?
The performance of scoring tools to select clinical vignettes for presentation at academic meetings has never been assessed. ⋯ Both scoring tools performed well, but a simplified tool with three items (relevance, teaching value, and overall assessment) and detailed descriptors was optimal; the simplified tool could improve the reviewer efficiency and quality of clinical vignettes presented at national meetings.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Qualitative analysis of peer coaches' experiences with counseling African Americans about reducing heart disease risk.
Despite mounting evidence that peer coaches can make significant contributions to patient health, little is known about factors that must be addressed to engage and retain them in their role. ⋯ Programs that utilize peer support to enhance positive health behaviors should recognize that a spirit of volunteerism motivates many successful peer coaches. Program planners should acknowledge the special characteristics required of successful peer coaches when selecting, motivating and training individuals for this role.