Journal of pain and symptom management
-
Nursing care of the patient receiving spinal opioids for pain control is reviewed in a comprehensive manner. Selection of patients, nursing management and patient outcomes are discussed. Three pain control techniques are described: epidural opioid injection for cancer pain, epidural opioid infusion for acute postoperative pain, and single dose spinal opioids for postcesarean section pain. Monitoring and pharmacologic aspects common to all three forms of spinal opioid treatment are given, and specific nursing interventions for each therapy are delineated.
-
The outpatient management of spinal opioids presents multiple challenges to the home infusion pharmacist. These include compounding, Schedule II prescription control, dispensing for long-term infusion or injection, reimbursement, and the management of opioids in the home. Although spinal opioids such as meperidine, fentanyl, and methadone have been used to control intractable pain, preservative-free morphine is the preferred opioid for epidural and intrathecal injection. ⋯ Spinal opioids can be administered intermittently, by continuous infusion, or patient-controlled analgesia pump. Extensive clinical experience indicates that the home administration of spinal opioids is safe and effective. There is a need for additional research on stability, storage and use of various opioids administered in the home environment.
-
Spinal opioids have become increasingly popular agents for providing analgesia during labor, augmenting anesthesia during cesarean section, and providing pain relief after operative delivery. The development of spinal opioids in the management of obstetric pain is reviewed.
-
The use of spinal opioids in the management of acute pain is now widely accepted. The development of acute pain services has provided standardized approaches to the management of this modality. This article discusses technical considerations, monitoring, and benefits of this approach.
-
J Pain Symptom Manage · Apr 1990
Comparative StudyTreatment of pain and other symptoms in cancer patients: patterns in a North American and a South American hospital.
The charts of 200 consecutive patients with cancer pain admitted to a major teaching hospital in Edmonton, Canada (n = 100) and in Buenos Aires, Argentina (n = 100) were reviewed to assess the differences between North American (NA) and South American (SA) facilities in patterns of treatment of pain and other symptoms. Criteria for eligibility and methods were identical in both hospitals. Characteristics of patients (age, sex, primary tumor, reason for admission) and attending staff were similar between both hospitals. ⋯ The types of narcotics and the use of adjuvant drugs were significantly different between NA and SA. Nonpharmacologic treatments, antiemetics, and laxatives were more frequently used in NA. These results suggest that there are significant differences in symptomatic management of advanced cancer between institutions in NA and SA.