Journal of critical care
-
Journal of critical care · Jun 2002
ReviewChanging physician behavior: a review of patient safety in critical care medicine.
The publication of the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (AHRQ) report in July 2001 entitled "Making Health Care Safer: A Critical Analysis of Patient Safety Practices," represents a significant perceptual change in health care ideology. It can be argued that this compilation recognizes not only that medical errors occur in the health care system, but also that there are significant learning opportunities that may arise in the identification of these errors that are otherwise known as medical misadventures. The report concluded and outlined a series of 11 highly rated practices whose usage are associated with increased safety. ⋯ In other words, after the identification of the 11 priority safety practices, it is thus important to determine the most effective methods to change physician behavior toward these practices that will intuitively result in increased safety performance. Five different educational-based strategies have been identified as techniques to change physician behavior: (1) Academic Detailing, (2) Audit and Feedback, (3) Local Opinion Leaders, (4) Reminder Systems, and (5) Printed Material. This article reviews these strategies in the context of critical care medicine and offers some opinions regarding setting the future research agenda in this investigative field.
-
The Institute of Medicine's (IOMs) report, "To Err is Human," recently addressed patient safety in the United States, alerting the nation to the need for improved systems of health care. Seven main findings were addressed in this report, we focus on 3: (1) patient safety is a nationwide problem, (2) health care workers are not to blame, and (3) safety and harm are products of care systems. ⋯ We use a case example to outline the complex chain of medical and administrative system failures that can result in an adverse event. Then we discuss evidence linking ICU organizational characteristics with patient safety, focusing on how safer systems in ICUs can directly improve patient care.
-
Journal of critical care · Jun 2002
Pressure relief bedding to prevent pressure ulcer development in critical care.
One major risk for the critically ill patient is the development of pressure ulcers during the intensive care unit (ICU) stay. These patients have many of the risk factors for the development of pressure ulcers including reduced mobility/activity, medications, neurologic deficits, increasing age, incontinence, decreased mental status, poor nutrition, pressure, shear forces, and friction. Pressure ulcers are known to be costly for the health care system and delay recovery in many patients. ⋯ The focus of this article is to describe the state of the current research in this area and how this applies to critical care. Development of protocols and guidelines for the use of pressure ulcer preventing strategies are important to improve the quality of care in the ICU. There is still a need to examine the impact of the evidence of pressure ulcer prevention in the ICU and this review should help to build a framework for future research and protocol development.
-
Journal of critical care · Jun 2002
ReviewVenous thromboembolism and its prevention in critical care.
Evidence-based guidelines for the prevention of venous thromboembolism (VTE) are available for most major surgical and medical patient groups. Such guidelines have not been established for critically ill patients. ⋯ Data on the epidemiology of VTE and its prevention in critically ill patients are very limited. Further research is needed to better define patient risk factors for VTE, optimal methods of thromboprophylaxis, and strategies to improve compliance with prophylaxis recommendations. In the meantime, prevention strategies, shown to be effective in other related patient groups, and general principles of individual pharmacotherapy should guide the routine use of prophylaxis during critical illness.
-
Placement of central venous catheters (CVCs) is an integral part of care for the critically ill patient but is associated with significant morbidity when using the traditional landmark method. The use of real-time ultrasound to guide line placement has been developed in hopes of avoiding this morbidity. ⋯ Adoption of real-time ultrasound to guide CVC placement has the potential to improve successful line placement and minimized complications. It can improve patient safety. However, there are significant cost concerns and the reported adverse events are generally minor and easy to treat. Before creating study protocols to increase usage of this technology, both current usage and cost effectiveness should be determined.