American journal of preventive medicine
-
Comparative Study
Health promotion and disease prevention in health care reform.
-
Review Comparative Study
Cardiovascular disease risk factors in native Americans: a literature review.
Cardiovascular disease (CVD) has become the leading cause of death for Native Americans and Alaska Natives. CVD risk factors (diabetes, hypertension, obesity, hypercholesterolemia, smoking, and sedentary lifestyle) have been studied in a number of Native American tribes, and such studies are increasing as the CVD mortality rate rises. This article reviews the literature between 1980 and 1991 concerning the prevalence of CVD risk factors in this population. In addition to summarizing the data, we describe limitations inherent in comparison and address the need for standardization of methodology in future studies.
-
Comparative Study
Correctness of racial coding of American Indians and Alaska Natives on the Washington State death certificate.
Underestimation of death rates for specific races can obscure health problems and impair the ability of public programs to prevent premature death and disability. For accurate race-specific death rates, the racial classification of both the population at risk and the decreased population must be accurately ascertained. However, studies suggest that the American Indian (AI) and Alaska Native (AN) races may be not be accurately recorded on the death certificate. ⋯ The percentage of American Indian ancestry was strongly associated with correct racial classification on the death certificate (P < .001). Birth in Washington State, membership in a large Washington State tribe, and death from an alcohol condition independently added to the likelihood of correct AI or AN racial classification. Persons who died from cancer were significantly less likely to be correctly coded as AI or AN on the death certificate.
-
Comparative Study
Board certification among preventive medicine residency graduates: characteristics, advantages, and barriers.
In 1991, a mail survey was conducted of graduates (1979-1989) of general preventive medicine/public health (GPM/PH) residency programs to obtain information about the graduates' demographic characteristics, training, and present professional work. Specifically, we evaluated the survey data for percentage of graduates with board certification, advantages of board certification, and barriers to board certification in preventive medicine (PM). The survey response rate was 74% (797 of 1,070 graduates). ⋯ Reasons for not taking the board examination included the perception of limited benefit of board certification in current employment or professional endeavors, previous board certification in a clinical specialty, lack of a master of public health (MPH) degree, high cost and time commitment for the examination, and uncertainty about examination admission requirements. PM residency graduates with board certification in PM were more likely to be involved in public health and preventive medicine programs, devoted more time to administration and management, and earned more income than those PM residency graduates without PM board certification. Increasing the percentage of residency graduates who pursue PM board certification will require increasing the advantages of certification for practice, encouraging all residents to identify themselves as practicing the specialty of PM, and addressing the unique concerns of physicians who train both in PM and in a purely or primarily clinical specialty.