Pediatric nephrology : journal of the International Pediatric Nephrology Association
-
Comparative Study
Comparing cystatin C and creatinine in the diagnosis of pediatric acute renal allograft dysfunction.
Allograft function following renal transplantation is commonly monitored using serum creatinine. Multiple cross-sectional studies have shown that serum cystatin C is superior to creatinine for detection of mild to moderate chronic kidney dysfunction. Recent data in adults indicate that cystatin C might also be a more sensitive marker of acute renal dysfunction. This study aims to compare cystatin C and creatinine for detection of acute allograft dysfunction in children using pediatric RIFLE (risk of renal dysfunction, injury to the kidney, failure or loss of kidney function, end stage renal disease) criteria for acute kidney injury. ⋯ In this pediatric population, cystatin C was not superior to creatinine for the detection of acute allograft dysfunction.
-
Urine interleukin-18 and cystatin-C as biomarkers of acute kidney injury in critically ill neonates.
Urinary interleukin-18 and cystatin-C are suggested to be biomarkers for predicting acute kidney injury (AKI). The aims of this study are to examine whether the urinary concentrations of interleukin-18 and cystatin-C vary with gestational age and other factors in non-AKI control neonates, and to determine whether urinary interleukin-18 and cystatin-C can predict AKI development in non-septic critically ill neonates, independently of potential confounders. ⋯ The urinary concentration of cystatin-C, but not interleukin-18, may decrease with increasing renal maturity. Both urinary interleukin-18 and cystatin-C are independently predictive of AKI in non-septic critically ill neonates.
-
Comparative Study
Short-term efficacy of rituximab versus tacrolimus in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome.
Although therapy with intravenous (IV) rituximab and tacrolimus reduces the relapse rate in steroid-dependent nephrotic syndrome (SDNS), studies on comparative efficacy are lacking. We retrospectively reviewed the records of patients with difficult-to-treat SDNS who had previously received levamisole, cyclophosphamide and/or mycophenolate mofetil, then treated with either rituximab or tacrolimus and followed for 12 months. Between January 2009 and April 2010, ten patients received two to three doses of IV rituximab (375 mg/m(2)/week) and 13 received tacrolimus (0.1-0.2 mg/kg/day) for 12 months; none had previously received either agent. ⋯ There were no differences in relapse-free survival at 6, 12 and 18 months. Therapy resulted in a significant decline in the cumulative prednisolone dose (67.2% in the rituximab group and 43.6% in the tacrolimus group) and a reduced body mass index. These findings suggest that in our patients with difficult-to-treat SDNS, treatment with two to three doses of rituximab was as effective as 12 months of therapy with tacrolimus in terms of steroid sparing and reduction in the relapse rate.