Neurophysiologie clinique = Clinical neurophysiology
-
The goal of endovascular neurosurgery is to occlude aneurysms and arteriovenous malformations (AVMs) or to reduce the vascular supply to hypervascularized tumors, while preserving function in the normal neural tissue. However, the intra-arterial injection of embolizing materials into the cerebral or spinal circulation exposes to the risk of ischemic complications. Under general anesthesia, unless a wake-up test is performed, the only way to assess the functional integrity of sensory and motor pathways is to use neurophysiological monitoring. ⋯ Our preliminary experience using lidocaine and combining SEP and mMEP monitoring is encouraging, since no false negative results were observed. Finally, if the sensitivity of this method is very high, its specificity has not been tested because embolization is abandoned whenever PTs are consistently positive. Accordingly, the possibility of false positive results cannot be excluded.
-
Transcranial electrical stimulated motor evoked potential monitoring (TES-MEP) has proven to be a successful and reliable neuromonitoring technique during spinal correction surgery. However, three criteria for TES-MEP monitoring have been described in the literature. This study aims at discussing and comparing the following criteria: (1) the "threshold level criterion" introduced by Calancie et al. (J Neurosurg 88 (1998) 457-70): a more than 100V over more than 1h increase of threshold level to get useful TES-MEP responses indicated neurological impairment; (2) the "amplitude criterion": for TES-MEP monitoring in corrective surgery of the spine, a more than 80% decrease of one or more response amplitudes was considered a valuable criterion for impending neurological deficits by Langeloo et al. (Spine 28 (2003) 1043-50); (3) "the morphology criterion": introduced in 2005 by Quinones et al. (Neurosurgery 56 (2005) 982-93), it is based on the morphology of the MEP-compound muscle action potentials (CMAP). ⋯ Although all methods have been reported to be successful during spinal surgery, the threshold criterion and the morphology change criterion carry several drawbacks. We consider the amplitude reduction method to be most useful during corrective spinal surgery. The sequences of observations and decisions during a TES-MEP monitoring that is based on this criterion are schematized in a flowchart.
-
During resection of intramedullary spinal-cord tumors intraoperative neurophysiological monitoring has become a true surgical technology. Motor evoked potentials are the most important modality for this purpose. Its use requires neurophysiological expertise from the surgeon, and a monitoring team in place able to handle the necessary equipment. ⋯ Such adaptation comprises simply waiting for the recordings to spontaneously improve again, irrigating with warm saline solution to wash out blocking potassium. Other measures include the elevation of mean arterial pressure to improve local perfusion. Even staged resection can be considered if intraoperative measures do not sufficiently improve the recordings.
-
Deep brain stimulation (DBS) of the subthalamic nucleus (STN) is increasingly used to treat advanced Parkinson's disease (PD). The optimal method for targeting the STN before implanting the definitive DBS electrode is still a matter of debates. Beside methods of direct visualization of the nucleus based on stereotactic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), the most often used technique for targeting STN consists in recording single-cell activity along exploratory tracks of 10-15mm in length, centered on the theoretical or MRI-defined target coordinates. ⋯ Signal amplitude significantly increased at the both rostral and caudal STN margins (P<0.05) and the level of neuronal activity easily distinguished inside from outside the nucleus. This study showed that STN boundaries could be adequately determined on the basis of intraoperative multi-unit recording with a semi-microelectrode. The accuracy of our method used for positioning DBS electrodes into the STN was confirmed both on CT-MRI fusion images and on the rate of therapeutic efficacy.
-
To analyse the parallel use of transcranial electrical stimulation (TES) and direct cortical stimulation (DCS) for eliciting muscle motor evoked potentials (MMEPs) in intracranial aneurysm surgery; to correlate permanent or transient TES- and/or DCS-MMEP changes with surgical maneuvers and clinical motor outcome. ⋯ In aneurysm surgery, provided that close-to-motor-threshold stimulation and the most focal stimulating electrode montage are used, TES- and DCS-MMEPs do not differ in their capacity to detect an impending lesion of the motor cortex or its efferent pathways. TES stimulation can cause significant muscular contraction during surgery, potentially disrupting the operating surgeon. DCS maintains the singular advantage of stimulating a very focal and superficial motor cortex stimulation that does not result in patient movement.