Journal of cardiology
-
Journal of cardiology · Jan 1999
[Evaluation of mitral valve lesions in patients with infective endocarditis by three-dimensional echocardiography].
Recognition of the involved lesions is extremely important in mitral valve repair for infective endocarditis. Transesophageal echocardiography (TEE) is more sensitive for the detection of lesions than transthoracic echocardiography, but localization of the lesions is sometimes difficult by TEE. Three-dimensional (3D) TEE provides images of the mitral valve similar to the view from the left atrium. ⋯ The sensitivities of 3D TEE for detecting the lesions at the medial, central and lateral portions of the anterior leaflet, and the medial, middle and lateral scallops of the posterior leaflet were 100%, 78% and 67%, and 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. The specificities were 90%, 100% and 78%, and 100%, 100% and 100%, respectively. The lesions diagnosed by 3D TEE coincided with lesions confirmed at operation in 23 (92%) of 25 lesions. 3D TEE is useful for the assessment of the involved lesion of the mitral valve in patients with infective endocarditis.
-
Journal of cardiology · Jan 1999
[Significance of atrial fibrillation, left atrial thrombus and severity of stenosis for risk of systemic embolism in patients with mitral stenosis].
The prognostic significance of atrial fibrillation, left atrial thrombus and the severity of mitral stenosis (MS) for systemic embolism was evaluated in 142 consecutive patients with MS (male 61, female 81; mean age 51 +/- 10 years) who were referred for cardiac catheterization. The relationships between systemic embolization, atrial fibrillation, left atrial thrombus and the size of mitral valve area obtained by the echocardiographic or Doppler method, or cardiac catheterization (Gorlin's formula) were studied. The effects of mitral regurgitation (MR) (Sellers II < or =) on systemic embolism or left atrial thrombus were also evaluated. ⋯ There was no significant difference between the 3 groups. Left atrial thrombus was more frequently observed in patients without MR than with MR (44% vs 13%, p < 0.05), but there was no significant difference in the incidence of embolism between the groups (28% vs 22%). Positive therapy intervention should be considered to prevent systemic embolism regardless of the presence or absence of sinus rhythm, MR, left atrial thrombus or severity of stenosis.