Current opinion in infectious diseases
-
Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. · Apr 2012
ReviewFor whom should we use selective decontamination of the digestive tract?
This review discusses the relevant studies on selective decontamination of the digestive tract (SDD) published between 2009 and mid-2011. ⋯ Recent studies show that in ICUs with low levels of antibiotic resistance, SDD and SOD improved patient outcome and reduced infections and carriage with antibiotic-resistant pathogens. The effect in settings with higher levels of antibiotic resistance remains to be determined as well as the efficacy of SDD and SOD in specific patient groups.
-
This review evaluates the potential benefits as well as adverse effects from adjunctive therapy with systemic steroids in patients with pneumonia: either mild-to-moderate or severe, community-acquired or hospital-acquired, of bacterial or of viral origin (in particular H1N1 viral infection). ⋯ According to the current evidence, there are no data to support the well tolerated use of systemic steroids as a standard of care in pneumonia, neither in mild-to-moderate and severe, nor in bacterial and viral infection. Clinical and basic research should work together to improve trial designs to identify reliable surrogate markers of outcome, in particular of mortality. This may improve the patient selection and facilitate the identification of subgroups that can benefit from adjunctive steroid therapy.
-
Curr. Opin. Infect. Dis. · Apr 2012
ReviewIs a ventilator-associated pneumonia rate of zero really possible?
The increasing number of hospitals reporting ventilator-associated pneumonia (VAP) rates at or close to zero begs the question of whether zero should become the national benchmark for VAP. This article explores the significance of very low VAP rates, reviews differences in surveillance and clinical rates, proposes reasons for their discrepancies, and suggests possible objective alternatives for surveillance. ⋯ The increasing mismatch between surveillance rates and clinical diagnoses limits the utility of official VAP rates to estimate disease burden and guide quality improvement. Advocates are advised to consider objective alternatives such as average duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay, mortality, and antibiotic prescribing. Emerging surveillance definitions that use more objective criteria may better reflect and inform future clinical practice.