Journal of neurotrauma
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Dec 2024
Multicenter StudyAssociation between admission systolic blood pressure and outcomes in patients with isolated traumatic brain injury: A cross-national multicentre cohort study.
The optimal prehospital blood pressure in patients following traumatic brain injury (TBI) remains controversial. We aimed to assess the association between the systolic blood pressure (SBP) at emergency department triage and patient outcomes following isolated moderate-to-severe TBI. We conducted a cross-national multicenter retrospective cohort study using the Pan-Asia Trauma Outcomes Study database from January 1, 2016, to November 30, 2018. ⋯ As for the secondary outcome, the aORs and 95% CIs were 1.36 (0.68-2.68) of <100 mmHg, 0.99 (0.57-1.70) of 120-139 mmHg, 1.23 (0.67-2.25) of 140-159 mmHg, and 1.52 (0.78-2.95) of ≥160 mmHg. Subgroup analyses revealed trends of the best outcomes in both moderate and severe TBI patients with SBP 100-119 mmHg, whereas statistical significance appeared only in patients with severe TBI. SBP of 110-119 mmHg at triage is associated with the lowest 30-day mortality in patients following isolated moderate-to-severe TBI and possibly related to a better functional outcome.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Dec 2024
Multicenter Study Observational StudyVolumetric assessment of traumatic intracranial hematomas: is ABC/2 reliable?
Accurate measurement of traumatic intracranial hematoma volume is important for assessing disease progression and prognosis, as well as for serving as an important end-point in clinical trials aimed at preventing hematoma expansion. While the ABC/2 formula has traditionally been used for volume estimation in spontaneous intracerebral hemorrhage, its adaptation to traumatic hematomas lacks validation. This study aimed to compare the accuracy of ABC/2 with computer-assisted volumetric analysis (CAVA) in estimating the volumes of traumatic intracranial hematomas. ⋯ Bland-Altman analysis highlighted wide limits of agreement, especially in SDH. While both methods demonstrated comparable accuracy in predicting outcomes, CAVA was slightly better at predicting craniotomies and midline shift. We conclude that while ABC/2 provides a generally reliable volumetric assessment suitable for descriptive purposes and as baseline variables in studies, CAVA should be the gold standard in clinical situations and studies requiring more precise volume estimations, such as those using hematoma expansion as an outcome.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Oct 2024
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyPredicting Progression of Intracranial Hemorrhage in the Prehospital TXA for TBI Trial.
Progression of intracranial hemorrhage is a common, potentially devastating complication after moderate/severe traumatic brain injury (TBI). Clinicians have few tools to predict which patients with traumatic intracranial hemorrhage on their initial head computed tomography (hCT) scan will progress. The objective of this investigation was to identify clinical, imaging, and/or protein biomarkers associated with progression of intracranial hemorrhage (PICH) after moderate/severe TBI and to create an accurate predictive model of PICH based on clinical features available at presentation. ⋯ Models composed of machine-selected features performed better than models composed of expert-selected variables (reaching an average of 77% accuracy, AUC = 0.78 versus AUC = 0.68 for the expert-selected variables). Predictive models utilizing variables measured at admission can accurately predict PICH, confirmed by the 6-hour follow-up hCT. Our best-performing models must now be externally validated in a separate cohort of TBI patients with low GCS and initial hCT positive for hemorrhage.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Sep 2024
Multicenter Study Observational StudyExtent of traumatic spinal cord injury is lesion level dependent and predictive of recovery: a multicenter neuroimaging study.
Assessing the extent of the intramedullary lesion after spinal cord injury (SCI) might help to improve prognostication. However, because the neurological level of injury impacts the recovery potential of SCI patients, the question arises whether lesion size parameters and predictive models based on those parameters are affected as well. In this retrospective observational study, the extent of the intramedullary lesion between individuals who sustained cervical and thoracolumbar SCI was compared, and its relation to clinical recovery was assessed. ⋯ The two times greater lesion length in thoracolumbar compared with cervical SCI might be related to differences in the anatomy, biomechanics, and perfusion between the cervical and thoracic spines. Preserved tissue bridges were less influenced by the lesion level while closely related to the clinical impairment. These results highlight the robustness and utility of tissue bridges as a neuroimaging biomarker for predicting the clinical outcome after SCI in heterogeneous patient populations and for patient stratification in clinical trials.
-
Journal of neurotrauma · Aug 2024
Multicenter StudyA Model Predicting the 6-month Disability of Patients with Traumatic Brain Injury to Assess the Quality of Care in Intensive Care Units: Results from the CREACTIVE Study.
Assessing quality of care is essential for improving the management of patients experiencing traumatic brain injury (TBI). This study aimed at devising a rigorous framework to evaluate the quality of TBI care provided by intensive care units (ICUs) and applying it to the Collaborative Research on Acute Traumatic Brain Injury in Intensive Care Medicine in Europe (CREACTIVE) consortium, which involved 83 ICUs from seven countries. The performance of the centers was assessed in terms of patients' outcomes, as measured by the 6-month Glasgow Outcome Scale-Extended (GOS-E). ⋯ The model was used as a benchmark for assessing quality of care by comparing the observed number of patients experiencing GR, MD, SD, and D/VS to the corresponding numbers expected in each category by the model, computing observed/expected (O/E) ratios. The four center-specific ratios were assembled with polar representations and used to provide a multidimensional assessment of the ICUs, overcoming the loss of information consequent to the traditional dichotomizations of the outcome in TBI research. The proposed framework can help in identifying strengths and weaknesses of current TBI care, triggering the changes that are necessary to improve patient outcomes.