Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Comparative Study
A collaborative regional ocular anesthesia training program: successes and failures.
To describe a collaborative effort of the departments of ophthalmology and anesthesiology to teach anesthesiology residents regional ocular anesthesia; to detect any differences in positive or negative outcomes after blocks performed by anesthesiology residents versus blocks performed by ophthalmology residents. ⋯ Regional ocular anesthetic techniques can be safely and successfully taught to residents in anesthesiology.
-
Airway management in patients with unstable cervical spines remains a challenge for anesthesia providers. Because neurologic evaluations may be required following tracheal intubation and positioning for the surgical procedure, an awake intubation technique is desirable in this patient population. ⋯ After topical local analgesia, the ILMA was inserted easily, and a tracheal tube was passed through the glottic opening without complications. Thus, the ILMA may be an acceptable alternative to the fiberoptic bronchoscope for awake tracheal intubation.
-
To determine whether anesthesiologists agree with each other when assessing actual malpractice clinical scenarios, whether their assessments comport with the actual malpractice verdicts, and whether they can accurately guess jury verdicts. ⋯ For this sample of homogeneous anesthesiologists who demonstrated high clinical agreement, it appears that the malpractice system may not be able to function on its own terms in adjudicating malpractice claims. Although there was agreement among respondent anesthesiologists, these assessments were in direct opposition to actual verdicts, a significant percentage of cases resulted in disagreements as to the appropriate standard of care, and anesthesiologists could not successfully predict jury verdicts. The malpractice system appears to be operating far from its theoretical ideal if these results could be applied more generally. Thus, in practice, the legal system, which is to provide an optimal level of injury deterrence, may be a poor method to limit patient injury, improve patient safety, and provide compensation to negligently injured patients in the health delivery system.