Journal of clinical anesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Norepinephrine or phenylephrine for the prevention of post-spinal hypotension after caesarean section: A double-blinded, randomized, controlled study of fetal heart rate and fetal cardiac output.
Spinal anesthesia often causes hypotension, with consequent risk to the fetus. The use of vasopressor agents has been highly recommended for the prevention of spinal anesthesia-induced hypotension during caesarean delivery. Many studies have shown that norepinephrine can provide more stable maternal hemodynamics than phenylephrine. We therefore tested the hypothesis that norepinephrine preserves fetal circulation better than phenylephrine when used to treat maternal hypotension consequent to spinal anesthesia. ⋯ Prophylactic infusion of comparable doses of phenylephrine or norepinephrine has similar effects on fetal heart rate and cardiac output changes after spinal anesthesia. Neither phenylephrine nor norepinephrine has meaningful detrimental effects on fetal circulation or neonatal outcomes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study
The impact of hindsight bias on the diagnosis of perioperative events by anesthesia providers: A multicenter randomized crossover study.
Hindsight bias is the tendency to overestimate the predictability of an event after it has already occurred. We aimed to evaluate whether hindsight bias influences the retrospective interpretation of clinical scenarios in the field of anesthesiology, which relies on clinicians making rapid decisions in the setting of perioperative adverse events. ⋯ Hindsight bias influences the clinical diagnosis probabilities assigned by anesthesia providers. Clinicians should be educated on hindsight bias in perioperative medicine and be cognizant of the effect of hindsight bias when interpreting clinical outcomes.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Assessing different brain oxygenation components in elderly patients under propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia: A randomized controlled study.
Elderly patients undergoing pathophysiological changes necessitate clinical tools for cerebral monitoring. This prospective randomized controlled study aimed to explore how cerebral monitoring using Δo2Hbi, ΔHHbi, and ΔcHbi manifests in elderly patients under either propofol or sevoflurane anesthesia. ⋯ In cerebral oximetry, Δo2Hbi and ΔHHbi could emerge as a valuable approach for discerning changes in the underlying baseline status of the brain in elderly patients during anesthesia.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Systemic lidocaine versus erector spinae plane block for improving quality of recovery after laparoscopic cholecystectomy: A randomized controlled trial.
To compare intravenous lidocaine, ultrasound-guided erector spinae plane block (ESPB), and placebo on the quality of recovery and analgesia after laparoscopic cholecystectomy. ⋯ For patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy, intravenous lidocaine provides a non-inferior quality of recovery compared to ESPB without requiring specialized regional anesthesia procedures. Lidocaine may offer a practical and accessible alternative within multimodal analgesia pathways.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study
Ultrasound-guided mid point-transverse process to pleura block versus thoracic paravertebral block in pediatric open-heart surgery: A randomized controlled non-inferiority study.
The mid-point transverse process to pleura block (MTPB) is a new variant of thoracic paravertebral block (TPVB). This study aimed to compare TPVB and MTPB with respect to intraoperative attenuation of the hemodynamic stress response to surgery and postoperative analgesia in pediatric open heart surgery with midline sternotomy. ⋯ MTPB is non-inferior to TPVB in attenuating the intraoperative hemodynamic stress response to noxious surgical stimuli and in reducing perioperative opioid consumption, extubation time, and ICU discharge time. Moreover, MTPB is technically easier than TPVB and requires less time to perform. Clinical trial registration number The clinical trial registration was prospectively performed at the Pan African Clinical Trials Registry (PACTR202204901612169, approval date 01/04/2022, URL https://pactr.samrc.ac.za/TrialDisplay.aspx?TrialID=22602).