Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
Anaesthesiologists are regularly consulted to provide anaesthesia for children in settings other than an operating room. Current debate focuses on the appropriateness of the presence of an anaesthesiologist versus a non-anaesthesiologist. There is mounting evidence that the presence of an anaesthesiologist is safer. We will review the recent literature concerning paediatric anaesthesia outside the operating room and offer recommendations that may impact on efficacy and safety.
-
Burns resuscitation has evolved over the past few decades towards more evidence-based management. It has been shown that patients with major burns (i.e. involving more than 30% of the body surface) benefit from invasive monitoring, and physiological variable targeted resuscitation using vasoactive agents for cardiovascular support. The invasive approach results in a reduction of mortality rates. ⋯ Fresh frozen plasma should only be used for specific coagulation disorders. On the other hand, artificial colloids, particularly gelatine, remain a useful tool in patients with major burns and haemodynamic instability, particularly, and can be given as early as 6 h after injury. Considering the actual evidence, using inotropes and vasopressors to reach supranormal haemodynamic endpoints seems preferable to delivering unrestricted amounts of fluid.
-
Taking in charge severely ill patients in the intensive care environment to manage complex procedures is a performance requiring highly specific knowledge. Close collaboration between anaesthetists and intensive care specialists is likely to improve the safety and quality of medical care. ⋯ New modes of administration and monitoring intravenous anaesthesia have been developed, with potential application in the intensive care unit. These include the use of target-controlled administration of intravenous drugs, and of electroencephalographic signals to monitor the level of sedation.