Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
To review the techniques for imaging cerebral blood flow and metabolism following injury to the brain. ⋯ Imaging of cerebral blood flow and metabolism has been shown to be useful following a variety of causes of brain injury, as it can help to define the cause and extent of injury, identify appropriate treatments and predict outcome. Imaging based on CT techniques (Xenon CT and CT perfusion) can be implemented easily in most hospital centres, and are able to provide quantitative perfusion data in addition to structural images.
-
Much effort has been taken to prove that a treatment initiated before surgery is more effective in reducing postoperative pain compared with the same intervention started after surgery. Clinical studies failed to demonstrate major clinical benefits of preemptive analgesia, however, and the results of recent systemic reviews are equivocal. The present review will discuss recent clinical as well as experimental evidence of preemptive analgesia and examine the implications of a preventive postoperative pain treatment. ⋯ Extending a multimodal analgesic treatment into the postoperative period to prevent postoperative pain may be superior compared with preemptive analgesia. In the future, appropriate drug combinations, drug concentrations and duration of preventive strategies need to be determined to be most beneficial for the management of acute and chronic pain after surgery.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Oct 2006
ReviewManagement of physiological variables in neuroanaesthesia: maintaining homeostasis during intracranial surgery.
The recent literature on the perioperative maintenance of cerebral homeostasis was reviewed. ⋯ From the clinical point of view, the recent research has added only little to the knowledge on the management of physiological parameters in neurosurgery. More adequately powered studies focusing in specific problems, and having a meaningful aim relative to outcome, are needed also in neuroanaesthesia.
-
The review presents an overview of indications, limitations and practical aspects of regional anesthesia and analgesia in critically ill medical and surgical patients. ⋯ Regional anesthesia and analgesia in the critically ill can help to improve respiratory function, bowel function, mental status and patient comfort secondary to its opioid-sparing effects. Limitations for the use of regional anesthetic techniques are mainly associated with bleeding risks, hemodynamic side-effects, difficulties in neurologic assessment and the potential of local anesthetic toxicity.
-
The use of regional anesthesia, either alone or as an adjunct to general anesthesia, is at an all-time high. Demonstrated benefits include reduced side effects, more efficient use of facilities and enhanced patient satisfaction with the improved postoperative pain relief. New advances in equipment, techniques and medications have been incorporated over the past 10 years, and especially over the last 2 years. As the number of practitioners and procedures increase, the number of complications may rise as well. ⋯ Specific needle shapes, appropriate pharmacologic resuscitation from intravascular injection of local anesthetics and institutional procedures to positively identify patients and the correct block location are all part of a strategy to minimize the occurrence of adverse outcomes and to mitigate the consequences of those adverse events when they do occur. More importantly, these are changes that can be instituted immediately with minimal expense to the institution and great benefit to the patient.