Current opinion in anaesthesiology
-
This review is aimed at highlighting the recent developments and opportunities that are likely to impact the anesthesia team of the future. ⋯ The anesthesia team of the future will require the anesthesiologist to provide expertise across the entire domain of perioperative medicine. Meaningful decision support systems rely on accurate data analysis and incorporation of current clinical guidelines and recommendations.
-
This article will provide a review of mentorship in academic medicine. The review will include definitions and an overview of the evidence supporting the benefits, barriers, and structure of mentorship programmes in academic medicine and anesthesia. Finally, we will identify areas of further research. ⋯ Mentorship has been demonstrated to be an integral part of training and career development in academic medicine and benefits both mentees and mentors. Despite the promotion of mentorship in many academic anesthesia departments, little is published in the available literature supporting mentorship in anesthesia.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Dec 2011
ReviewRegional anesthetic procedures in immunosuppressed patients: risk of infection.
Due to demographic developments anesthesiologists encounter an increasing number of older and multimorbid patients in their daily routine. Consequently the proportion of immunosuppressed patients (e.g. those with cancer, diabetes mellitus, and those receiving immunosuppressive treatment and/or chemotherapy - e.g. for inflammatory bowel diseases, autoimmune diseases, and after transplantation) will also rise. Regional anesthesia (peripheral nerve blocks and neuraxial blockade) may be beneficial in these patients and will have to be considered in order to provide adequate pain management and minimize risks for the patients. ⋯ So far, there are no guidelines available dealing with indications and limitations of regional anesthetic procedures in these patients. The complication rate is rare but potentially disastrous. However, the technique itself cannot be regarded as absolute contraindication for immunosuppressed patients if precautions are taken. An interdisciplinary approach regarding the indication of regional anesthesia techniques in immunosuppressed patients is recommended. Efforts must therefore be made to achieve an interdisciplinary consensus with relevant risk-benefit considerations.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Dec 2011
ReviewRevival of old local anesthetics for spinal anesthesia in ambulatory surgery.
In recent years, several older (first intrathecal use in the 1950s, 1960s, and 1970s) local anesthetics have been investigated as spinal anesthetics in ambulatory surgery because these drugs are claimed to cause less transient neurologic symptoms (TNS) than lidocaine which was the main spinal anesthetic for surgery of short-duration for decades. The review covers the current literature. ⋯ The newest results corroborate (at least for chloroprocaine, articaine, and prilocaine) previous data that these drugs provide reliable and mostly well tolerated spinal blocks associated with an apparently smaller risk for postanesthesic TNS as compared with lidocaine. Further studies are warranted regarding broader indications, possible usefulness of adjuvants, and for the exploration of the side-effect profiles in detail. To what extent the observed revival of these older, rather well characterized local anesthetics leads to a wider use of spinal anesthesia in the ambulatory setting remains to be seen. This is also dependent on various organizational and local traditional factors.
-
Curr Opin Anaesthesiol · Dec 2011
ReviewThe potential benefits and the role of cerebral monitoring in carotid endarterectomy.
The benefit of carotid endarterectomy (CEA) in patients with symptomatic severe carotid stenosis is highly dependent on the perioperative stroke rate. Cerebral monitoring plays an important role in reducing the perioperative stroke rate as it allows detection of the main causes of perioperative stroke, being embolism, intraoperative hypoperfusion and postoperative hyperperfusion syndrome. However, some physicians doubt about the benefit of cerebral monitoring and consider it costly and time consuming. The aim of this review is to provide an overview of the available cerebral monitoring modalities and their role in CEA. ⋯ In our opinion, cerebral monitoring during CEA is essential because it provides direct information regarding new neurological deficits, which might otherwise be missed. Intraoperative cerebral monitoring provides immediate feedback to the treating physician allowing prompt correction in tissue handling. Several monitoring modalities are available for cerebral monitoring in CEA, but no single test is comprehensive. Therefore, a combination of several monitoring modalities with each specific strength not only during but also after CEA is recommended to cover all needs and reduce the perioperative stroke rate.