Annals of medicine
-
Insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (IDDM), or type I diabetes, is the end result mainly of a T-cell mediated autoimmune destruction of pancreatic islet beta cells. Genetical and environmental factors are both of importance in the pathogenesis. Genes in the HLA complex seem to be the most important genetical factors. ⋯ Thus, the recognition of certain islet beta cell derived peptides by self-reactive CD4+ T cells, may be an initial event in the pathogenesis. The DQ molecules involved in IDDM susceptibility or protection may exert their function either during thymic development of potential self-reactive CD4+ T cells, or by preferential presentation of certain beta-cell derived peptides to CD4+ T cells, or both. The finding that certain DQ molecules as such confer IDDM susceptibility may lead to new methods to prevent IDDM, for example by using blocking peptide analogues.
-
Non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus affects approximately 10% of urban Indian and Indian migrant populations and as such carries major health implications for these groups. Whilst a strong genetic component to the aetiology of non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus is incontestable, progress in identifying the specific genetic determinants involved in its pathogenesis has been slow. ⋯ A number of candidate genes have been studied with the aim of demonstrating either association or linkage with the disease; in South Indians the only positive results thus far have been associations between non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus and the genes for insulin, apolipoprotein D and complement component C4B. However, it seems likely that these genes contribute only a small proportion of the genetic susceptibility to non-insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus in this ethnic group and that the major genes underlying glucose intolerance remain to be determined.
-
Public and professional concern associated with the idea of genetic screening has generated numerous publications on the ethics of genetic screening (e.g. 1-4). Concerns revolve around inadequate consultation before screening is carried out, the unearthing of worrying risks, the use of genetic information in ways that could be disadvantageous to the person involved, stigma, and a phenomenon known as the 'technological imperative', which means that simply because a technology is available there is a tendency to use it. ⋯ I have been invited to discuss this subject as a clinician involved with genetic screening, counselling and prenatal diagnosis for the haemoglobin disorders, the most common serious human recessively inherited diseases. Since we are scientists, any recommendations we make should be based on experience: my aim is to show that experience is often surprising, and that it is often possible to meet public concerns by taking quite simple practical steps.