Urology
-
Testicular torsion is an active area of medical malpractice litigation because of the diagnostic uncertainty, delays in diagnosis and treatment, diagnostic errors, and resultant testicular loss. We reviewed this topic to determine the nature of patient claims and their clinical and legal outcomes. ⋯ Testicular torsion litigation most often focuses on the urologist. Claims are more common in older patients and those with atypical complaints. Settlement is the most common outcome, with a fairly standard indemnity payment rewarded. The initial treating physician must have a high index of suspicion for the diagnosis and refer promptly. In lieu of a definitive radiologic study, or when the diagnosis is in question, the urologist should strongly consider exploration and should perform contralateral exploration when torsion is found.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Chemoprevention trials in men with prostate-specific antigen failure or at high risk for recurrence after radical prostatectomy: Application to efficacy assessment of soy protein.
This article discusses the basic elements of chemoprevention trial designs using cohorts of men following radical prostatectomy who either have prostate-specific antigen (PSA) failure indicative of recurrence or are at high risk for recurrence (positive surgical margins, extracapsular extension, seminal vesicle invasion, positive lymph nodes, Gleason score of greater than or equal to 8, preoperative serum PSA less than 20 ng/mL). Two ongoing randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trials with soy protein as intervention in these 2 populations are described. ⋯ In the trial with men with PSA failure (PSA 0.1 to 2.0 ng/mL), participants received treatment for 8 months and the primary endpoint is rise in PSA over time. The strengths and limitations of these designs are discussed and interim experience using studies with soy protein as the intervention agent are summarized.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Randomized, controlled chemoprevention trials in populations at very high risk for prostate cancer: Elevated prostate-specific antigen and high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia.
This is a report of research efforts underway at the Arizona Cancer Center. These efforts build upon Larry Clark's unanticipated clinical prevention trial results: those results indicated that 200 microg/day of selenium in selenized yeast decreased prostate cancer risk by almost 60%. The trials underway address various phases of the possible preventive activity of selenium. ⋯ The third trial is for men who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer and are scheduled for prostatectomy: the trial is designed to test whether evidence of selenium-linked changes can be identified in the tissue removed at prostatectomy. The fourth trial is for men who have been diagnosed with prostate cancer but who have chosen neither surgery nor irradiation; this trial will evaluate whether treatment with selenium will inhibit the progress of prostate cancer. Together, these trials will provide important information as to the prostate cancer chemopreventive potential of selenium.
-
Prostate cancer chemoprevention represents a relatively new and promising strategy for reducing the immense public health burden of this devastating cancer of men in the United States and Western societies. Chemoprevention is defined as the administration of agents (drugs, biologics, and natural products) that modulate (inhibit) one or more steps in the multistage carcinogenesis process culminating in invasive adenocarcinoma of the prostate. In 2000, there were an estimated 170,000 new cases of prostate cancer and 31,000 deaths in the United States. ⋯ Senior FDA physicians from the Center for Drugs and Center for Biologics presented on current standards for new drug and biologic approval for chemoprevention efficacy. Some of the key topics included recent advances in the state of knowledge of promising agents in the clinic based on molecular targets as well as bottlenecks in drug development for pharmaceutical sponsors; strategic modulable biomarkers that can serve as primary endpoints in phase 1/2 trials to assess preventive efficacy; high-risk cohorts with precancer (high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia) and representative clinical trial designs that are ready for immediate translation into efficient prevention trials, such as Bayesian sequential monitoring for early assessment of biologic activity and factorial designs for assessment of multiagent combinations. Finally, each expert panel generated recommendations for areas of future research emphasizing opportunities and infrastructure needs.