Urology
-
Comparative Study
Prospective comparison of radical retropubic prostatectomy and robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy: the Vattikuti Urology Institute experience.
Robotic assistance may enhance the precision of anatomic dissection and increase the feasibility of performing laparoscopic radical prostatectomy for most surgeons. We performed a prospective comparison of 30 consecutive patients undergoing conventional radical retropubic prostatectomy (RRP) and 30 initial patients undergoing robot-assisted anatomic prostatectomy (RAP) at our institution. ⋯ Currently, RAP is a longer procedure than RRP. However, the blood loss is minimal and patients feel less pain and are discharged earlier from the hospital. In our hands, the margin status and complication rates were comparable for both techniques.
-
We describe a technique that uses simultaneous two-plane images to facilitate endoscopic recanalization of prostatomembranous urethral disruption. This technique is very useful for identifying the true passage and to perform endoscopic recanalization safely.