Journal of neurosurgical anesthesiology
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 2013
Review Meta AnalysisMeasuring Elevated Intracranial Pressure through Noninvasive Methods: A Review of the Literature.
Elevated intracranial pressure (ICP) is an important cause of secondary brain injury, and a measurement of ICP is often of crucial value in neurosurgical and neurological patients. The gold standard for ICP monitoring is through an intraventricular catheter, but this invasive technique is associated with certain risks. Intraparenchymal ICP monitoring methods are considered to be a safer alternative but can, in certain conditions, be imprecise due to zero drift and still require an invasive procedure. ⋯ The noninvasive methods have many advantages, but remain less accurate compared with the invasive techniques. None of the noninvasive techniques available today are suitable for continuous monitoring, and they cannot be used as a substitute for invasive monitoring. They can, however, provide a reliable measurement of the ICP and be useful as screening methods in select patients, especially when invasive monitoring is contraindicated or unavailable.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jul 2013
Review Meta AnalysisAwake craniotomy for brain tumor resection: the rule rather than the exception?
Awake craniotomy (AC) has seen an expanded role in brain tumor surgery over the past few decades. AC allows intraoperative cortical mapping and the continuous assessment of neurophysiological parameters, which are otherwise unattainable under general anesthesia (GA). The ability of AC to analyze eloquent brain areas makes it a powerful method for reducing the risks associated with tumor resection, especially in motor and language cortex. We present a review of the literature to examine the benefits and limits of using AC over GA. ⋯ Given the effectiveness of AC for resection of eloquent tumors, the data suggests an expanded role for AC in brain tumor surgery regardless of tumor location.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Oct 2012
Review Meta AnalysisPediatric anesthesia and neurodevelopmental impairments: a Bayesian meta-analysis.
Experimental evidence of anesthesia-induced neurotoxicity has caused serious concern about the long-term effect of commonly used volatile anesthetic agents on young children. Several observational studies based on existing data have been conducted to address this concern with inconsistent results. We conducted a meta-analysis to synthesize the epidemiologic evidence on the association of anesthesia/surgery with neurodevelopmental outcomes in children. ⋯ The most likely adjusted OR from a future study was estimated to be 1.5 (95% CrI, 0.5-4.0). We conclude that existent epidemiologic evidence suggests a modestly elevated risk of adverse behavioral or developmental outcomes in children who were exposed to anesthesia/surgery during early childhood. The evidence, however, is considerably uncertain.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Jan 2007
Review Meta AnalysisThe efficacy of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for the prevention of postoperative nausea and vomiting after craniotomy: a meta-analysis.
The purpose of this meta-analysis was to assess the efficacy of prophylactic administration of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists for postoperative nausea and vomiting in neurosurgical patients at 24 and 48+ hours. After a systematic search, 7 published randomized placebo controlled trials involving 448 craniotomy patients (222 treatment, 226 control) were included in the meta-analysis. Study drugs included ondansetron, granisetron, and tropisetron. ⋯ There were no differences between the treatment and control groups in the cumulative incidence of nausea at 24 hours (RR=0.76, 95% CI: 0.54-1.06) and 48+ hours (RR=0.81, 95% CI: 0.62-1.06). The cumulative incidence of both nausea and vomiting continued to increase after 24 hours in both groups. Despite the ability of 5-HT3 receptor antagonists to reduce emetic episodes, future investigations should seek to address the control of postoperative nausea and to reduce further postoperative emesis in this population.
-
J Neurosurg Anesthesiol · Apr 2001
Meta Analysis Comparative StudyPropofol [correction of propfol] versus methohexital for electroconvulsive therapy: a meta-analysis.
A systematic search (Medline, Cochrane library, Embase, bibliographies, to 5.2000, no language restriction) was performed for published reports of randomized comparisons of propofol and methohexital for anesthesia during electroconvulsive therapy. We analyzed 15 trials with data on 706 patients. The duration of motor seizure was shorter with propofol (range, 18-39 seconds) than with methohexital (range, 26-48 seconds, weighted mean difference 8.4 seconds [95% CI, 6.6-10.0]). ⋯ Data on adverse effects were sparse. Duration of seizure was not proven to be a useful measure of treatment success in the study of electroconvulsive therapy with propofol or methohexital. The impact of the technique of anesthesia on the underlying disease needs to be established.