Burns : journal of the International Society for Burn Injuries
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A randomised clinical trial comparing a hydrocolloid-derived dressing and glycerol preserved allograft skin in the management of partial thickness burns.
Membranous dressings for the treatment of partial and mixed thickness burns are among the most innovative and promising new developments of the last years. In this study, we present data of a randomised prospective comparative study on a carboxymethylcellulose based dressing, Hydrofibre((R)) and glycerolized human allograft skin. In a 2 year period, 80 patients (40 for each material) were enrolled in the trial. ⋯ Incidence of hypertrophy after 6 months was higher, but not significantly, in the Hydrofibre((R)) compared to the allograft skin group (52.5% versus 30%, P=0.09, chi-square). In view of the results from our comparative study on Hydrofibre((R)) versus allograft skin, we prefer the use of allograft skin for the category of larger burns of mixed depth, usually presented to burn centres. However, for partial thickness and small burns Hydrofibre((R)) can be the first choice in treatment.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Comparison of self-reported and monitored compliance of daily injection of human growth hormone in burned children.
Objectives. We compared insulin-like growth factor (IGF-I) levels obtained in two groups with different methods of assessing compliance. Burned children were randomized to receive a daily injection of 0.05-0.1mg/kg per day of recombinant human growth hormone (rhGH) or placebo. ⋯ In contrast, the percent change in IGF-I levels in the placebo group was significantly decreased (-5.6+/-6.3%). Conclusions. Self-reported scores via an SRCQ is a potentially useful and valid method of assessing compliance of rhGH injections, as both reported and directly monitored methods yield similar changes in levels of IGF-I.