Seminars in thoracic and cardiovascular surgery
-
Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jan 2014
ReviewThe theory, practice, and future of process improvement in general thoracic surgery.
Process improvement, in its broadest sense, is the analysis of a given set of actions with the aim of elevating quality and reducing costs. The tenets of process improvement have been applied to medicine in increasing frequency for at least the last quarter century including thoracic surgery. This review outlines the theory underlying process improvement, the currently available data sources for process improvement and possible future directions of research.
-
Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jan 2014
ReviewUse of antiplatelet drugs after cardiac operations.
Unfortunately, venous bypass grafts still have a prominent role in operative coronary revascularization (coronary artery bypass graft [CABG]). Venous grafts develop pathologically occlusive disease that limits the effectiveness of CABG, and antiplatelet drugs following operation may limit this problem. ⋯ Evidence suggests that, in most CABG patients, dual antiplatelet drugs (aspirin and clopidogrel), given after operation, minimizes early (within 1 year) graft failure and improves intermediate-term outcomes, better than single antiplatelet therapy with aspirin alone. There are gaps in the knowledge base that supports this contention, and future clinical trials will likely augment or alter this recommendation.
-
Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jan 2014
The new IASLC-ATS-ERS lung adenocarcinoma classification: what the surgeon should know.
In 2011, a new histologic classification of lung adenocarcinomas was proposed from a joint working group of the International Association for the Study of Lung Cancer, American Thoracic Society, and European Respiratory Society, based on the recommendation of an international and multidisciplinary panel. This classification proposed a method of comprehensive histologic subtyping (lepidic, acinar, papillary, micropapillary, and solid pattern) based on semiquantitative assessment of histologic patterns (in 5% increments), with the ultimate goal of choosing a single, predominant pattern. Prognostic subsets could then be described for the classification. ⋯ We also review the published studies that identified the importance of histologic subtypes in predicting recurrence, both rates and patterns, in early-stage lung adenocarcinomas. This new classification for the most common type of lung cancer is useful for surgeons, as its implementation would require only hematoxylin-and-eosin histology slides, which is the common type of stain used in hospitals. It can be implemented with routine pathology evaluation and with no additional costs.
-
Semin. Thorac. Cardiovasc. Surg. · Jan 2014
Eliminating a need for esophagectomy: endoscopic treatment of Barrett esophagus with early esophageal neoplasia.
Over the past several years, endoscopic ablation and resection have become a new standard of care in the management of Barrett esophagus (BE) with high-grade dysplasia (HGD) or intramucosal adenocarcinoma (IMC). Risk factors for failure of endoscopic therapy and the need for subsequent esophagectomy have not been well elucidated. The aims of this study were to determine the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) with or without endoscopic mucosal resection (EMR) in the management of BE with HGD or IMC, to discern factors predictive of endoscopic treatment failure, and to assess the effect of endoscopic therapies on esophagectomy volume at our institution. ⋯ No patient treated endoscopically for HGD or IMC subsequently required esophagectomy. In patients with BE with HGD or IMC, RFA and EMR are safe and highly effective. The use of endoscopic therapies appears justified as the new standard of care in most cases of BE with early esophageal neoplasia.
-
Transcatheter aortic valve replacement (TAVR) has been developed as a less-invasive approach to address patients at high risk to extreme risk for surgical aortic valve replacement. The CoreValve US trial enrolled patients with symptomatic severe aortic stenosis into 2 separate cohorts: an extreme-risk cohort and a high-risk cohort. ⋯ The CoreValve high-risk trial is the only randomized trial of TAVR vs surgical aortic valve replacement to show superior survival of TAVR. This was achieved with a numerically lower rate of major stroke and statistically superior changes in aortic valve function from baseline to 1 year.