European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery
-
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol · Dec 2017
Review3D printing for clinical application in otorhinolaryngology.
Three-dimensional (3D) printing is a promising technology that can use a patient's image data to create complex and personalized constructs precisely. It has made great progress over the past few decades and has been widely used in medicine including medical modeling, surgical planning, medical education and training, prosthesis and implants. ⋯ By integrating 3D printing into tissue engineering and materials, it may be possible for otolaryngologists to implant 3D printed functional grafts into patients for reconstruction of a variety of tissue defects in the foreseeable future. In this review, we will introduce the current state of 3D printing technology and highlight the applications of 3D printed prosthesis and implants, 3D printing technology combined with tissue engineering and future directions of bioprinting in the field of otolaryngology.
-
Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol · Dec 2017
Review Meta AnalysisTherapeutic modalities and oncologic outcomes in the treatment of T1b glottic squamous cell carcinoma: a systematic review.
T1a and T1b glottic squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) are often analyzed together by authors who investigate the oncologic outcomes achieved after different therapeutic options. Nevertheless, T1b definitely represents a more advanced tumor stage compared to T1a glottic SCC. The objective of this review was first to analyze the overall success rates in the treatment of patients affected by T1b glottic SCC. ⋯ Regarding the specific therapeutic options, our subgroup analysis showed as patients treated with TLM present a higher rate of oncological recurrence in comparison to those who underwent RT or OPL. Nevertheless, on the basis of our data it was also noted that no significant differences subsist in terms of survival rates among the three different treatments. Moreover, the absence of a comparative analysis useful to confirm these conclusions must be considered.