European journal of cancer : official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR)
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter Study Clinical Trial
Oral ondansetron in the prevention of chemotherapy-induced emesis in breast cancer patients. French Ondansetron Study Group.
A multicentre randomised, double-blind parallel group study has been carried out in order to confirm the antiemetic efficacy of orally administered ondansetron. A total of 259 chemotherapy-naive breast cancer patients treated with a 5-fluorouracil, doxorubicin, cyclophosphamide (FAC) or 5-fluorouracil, epirubicin, cyclophosphamide (FEC) regimen were randomly assigned to ondansetron (OND) 8 mg tablet or alizapride (ALI) 150 mg intravenous (i.v.) injection, prior to chemotherapy. These treatments were then followed by OND 8 mg tablet or ALI 50 mg tablet, respectively, 8 to 12 h later. ⋯ In terms of quality of life in relation to emesis phenomena, OND was significantly superior to ALI (P = 0.04). Both treatments were well tolerated. In the prevention of the prolonged emesis induced by FAC/FEC-type emetogenic chemotherapy, orally administered OND was superior to ALI, given as an i.v. injection and followed by tablets.
-
A prospective trial was performed to better assess the risk of nausea and vomiting and the rescue value of tropisetron (TRO), a 5-HT3 receptor antagonist, in 88 patients undergoing fractionated radiotherapy to the abdomen or to large supradiaphragmatic fields and failing a first anti-emetic trial with metoclopramide (MET). Nausea was graded 0 (absent), 1 (mild), 2 (moderate) and 3 (severe). Nausea requiring anti-emetics (> or = grade 2) was present in 64% of the patients. ⋯ MET helped to eliminate emesis in one third of these patients. TRO helped to control vomiting in 73% of the salvaged patients. Constipation was observed in 8 patients on TRO and was a reason to stop the medication in 4 cases.
-
In vitro and in vivo neuroblastoma models were used to determine whether improvements in tumour targeting in vivo and therapeutic efficacy in vitro could result from the use of no-carrier-added (n.c.a.) [131I]MIBG. Results were compared with use of the conventional therapy MIBG preparation (ex. [131I]MIBG) of lower specific activity which is produced by iodide exchange reaction. The efficacy of n.c.a. [131I]MIBG was compared with that of [131I]MIBG over a range of specific activities by the assessment of neuroblastoma spheroid growth delay. ⋯ However, uptake and retention in the blood was unaltered. For all tissues examined, the 3-day calculations were undertaken to predict organ to tumour dose ratios which would result in human neuroblastoma patients with each of the [131I]MIBG preparations. These results suggest that significant therapeutic gain may be achieved by the use of n.c.a. [131I]MIBG as a treatment agent in neuroblastoma. neuroblastoma.
-
The understanding and treatment of pain is one of the oldest challenges for physicians, scientists and philosophers. Much of our present rationale of pain control is based on the Cartesian idea that pain mostly originates from external or internal noxious stimuli, which are transmitted to and interpreted in the brain. Consequently, removal (blocking) of the stimuli and modification of cerebral awareness have been the prime targets of analgesic interventions. ⋯ The current preoccupation with quality assurance in healthcare is directed, ultimately, to the delivery of a better quality of care, which should also be more cost-effective, for large populations. An important intermediate step towards that ideal is the collection of data on pain and other symptoms, but also validated quality of life parameters on well-defined groups. Only by widening the scope of analgesic studies to include these dimensions can we hope to define appropriate strategies for more rational healthcare.
-
Quality of care and quality of life are patient-centred, whereas medical education tends to be disease-centred. More patient-centred models will be necessary to optimise the quality of care for cancer patients. This demands new priorities in medical education, new concepts for structuring and organising responsibilities in medical care, and new complementary task definitions for the players involved. ⋯ Quality of life measuring instruments should be adapted to the priorities of the clinical situation and implemented in basic practice routines. There is no single objective quality of life level or score, and measuring instruments must take into account different quality of life options. Multidisciplinarity and multimedia education means the appropriate learning instruments at the appropriate time for all those concerned.