European journal of cancer : official journal for European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer (EORTC) [and] European Association for Cancer Research (EACR)
-
It is unclear whether introducing organised mammography screening programmes in a population where opportunistic screening is prevalent results in the two types of screening mainly competing against each other or attracting different groups of women. To compare women who participate in organised screening and those who prefer opportunistic screening, we conducted a prospective study of 932 women followed for 8 months after an invitation to participate in the first round of an organised screening programme in Geneva, Switzerland. All women were aged 50-69 years and were due for a mammogram according to local guideline. ⋯ Women who were in the stage of contemplation, had favourable attitude toward mammography screening, and perceived their risk of breast cancer to be high were more likely to have a mammogram (either organised or opportunistic). Compared to women who had an opportunistic mammogram, women with an organised mammogram were less positive about screening, less likely to be in maintenance at baseline (adjusted odds ratio (OR), 3.0; 95% confidence interval (CI), 1.7-5.5), to have a history of benign breast disease (OR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.2-5.1) and to perceive their financial situation as comfortable (OR, 1.7; 95% CI, 1.1-2.8). Although screening uptake was low, the programme appeared to attract women in lower socio-economic strata who did not usually undergo mammography screening.
-
Targeting of epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and HER2 is a proven anti-cancer strategy. However, heterodimerisation, compensatory 'crosstalk' and redundancy exist in the ErbB network, and there is therefore a sound scientific rationale for dual inhibition of EGFR and HER2. ⋯ Lapatinib, a TKI of EGFR and HER2, has shown clinical benefit in trastuzumab refractory breast cancer and is poised for FDA approval. Other agents include BIBW-2992 and HKI-272, irreversible TKIs of EGFR and HER2, and pertuzumab, a heterodimerisation inhibitor of EGFR and HER2.
-
Multicenter Study Comparative Study
A comparison of quality of life, disease impact and risk perception in women with invasive breast cancer and ductal carcinoma in situ.
We compared the health-related quality of life, impact of the disease, risk perception of recurrence and dying of breast cancer, and understanding of diagnosis of patients with ductal carcinoma in situ (DCIS) and invasive breast cancer 2-3 years after treatment. We included all women (N=211) diagnosed with DCIS or invasive breast cancer TNM stage I (T1, N0, and M0) in three community hospitals in the southern part of The Netherlands in the period 2002-2003. After verifying the medical files, 180 disease free patients proved eligible for study entry, 47 of whom had DCIS and 133 stage I invasive breast cancer. ⋯ In contrast, women with DCIS reportedly had a better physical health, better sex life and better relationships with friends/acquaintances than women with invasive breast cancer. Despite their better prognosis, the DCIS-group had comparable perceptions of the risk of recurrence and dying of breast cancer as women with invasive breast cancer. However, this did not appear to affect their well-being significantly.
-
The aim of our study was to compare the overall and site-based accuracy and impact on patient management of positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET/CT) and whole-body (wb) magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in staging of advanced melanoma. In a prospective blinded study, 64 patients with American Joint Committee on Cancer (AJCC) stage III/IV melanoma underwent 18F-fluorodeoxyglucose PET/CT and wbMRI. In total 420 lesions were evaluated. ⋯ WbMRI was less sensitive but more specific than PET/CT in classifying pulmonary lesions. In 41 patients (64%) whole-body imaging caused changes of treatment. Whole-body staging of patients with advanced melanoma is most accurate by combining wbPET/CT and organ-specific wbMRI including a brain, liver and bone marrow protocol.