Journal of cardiovascular electrophysiology
-
J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. · Jan 2014
Randomized Controlled Trial Multicenter StudyProgramming implantable cardioverter-defibrillators in patients with primary prevention indication to prolong time to first shock: results from the PROVIDE study.
Shock therapy delivery by implantable cardioverter-defibrillators (ICD) can be painful and may have adverse consequences. Reducing shock burden for patients with ICDs would be beneficial. ⋯ A combination of programmed parameters utilizing higher detection rate, longer detection intervals, empiric ATP, and optimized SVT discriminators reduced ICD therapies without increasing arrhythmic syncope and was associated with reduction in all-cause mortality among ICD patients.
-
J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. · Jan 2014
Multicenter Study Comparative StudyCryoballoon versus RF ablation in paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: results from the German Ablation Registry.
Catheter ablation is used extensively with curative intention in atrial fibrillation. Radiofrequency ablation has long been a standard of care, while cryoballoon technology has emerged as a feasible approach with promising results. Prospective multicenter registry data referring to both ablation technologies in AF ablation therapy are lacking. ⋯ RF ablation is the most widespread ablation method in Germany, but use of cryoballoon increased significantly. Procedure times were similar, but ablation and fluoroscopy times were longer in cryoballoon ablation. No significant differences were found in terms of acute success and overall complication rate.
-
J. Cardiovasc. Electrophysiol. · Jan 2014
Comparative StudyComparative outcomes of transvenous extraction of sprint fidelis and riata defibrillator leads: a single center experience.
The FDA has issued class I advisories for Medtronic Sprint Fidelis(®) and St. Jude Medical Riata(TM) ICD lead families. Transvenous Riata(TM) ICD lead extraction is typically considered higher risk than Fidelis(®) extraction, based on longer duration from implant, presence of externalized conductors and lack of silicone backfill in the SVC and RV coils. However, published data comparing procedural outcomes between these leads are limited. ⋯ Despite differences in baseline characteristics, this study indicates that Medtronic Sprint Fidelis(®) and St. Jude Riata(TM) ICD leads have similar procedural outcomes with transvenous lead extraction.