Neuroreport
-
We studied somatosensory-evoked fields elicited by mechanical versus electrical stimuli to index finger of healthy participants. Mechanical stimulation was index pulp compression and decompression by using nonmagnetic mechanical stimulator. Electrical stimulation was three times of sensory threshold and delivered to index pulp by using ball-shaped electrodes. ⋯ Compressive stimuli evoked ipsilateral primary sensorimotor cortical responses in all respective participants, with dipole strengths less than contralateral primary somatosensory cortical responses of compressive stimuli. Mechanical/electrical stimuli evoked secondary somatosensory (SII) cortical responses bilaterally; electrical-stimuli SII dipole strengths were relatively stronger than compressive-stimuli SII responses. It is concluded that the use of mechanical stimulation may improve our understanding of functional sensory cortical responses compared with electrical stimulation.
-
It has been proposed that high-frequency oscillations (HFOs) and underlying conventional somatosensory-evoked potentials (SEPs) have different brain origins. To further explore the neural mechanism of HFOs, we recorded the SEPs responding to high-intensity electrical stimulation applied to the hind paw of conscious, freely moving rats. ⋯ The amplitude of HFOs was significantly decreased by systemic morphine, whereas the primary conventional SEP components remained unaffected. The different changes in HFOs and primary SEP components after systemic morphine administration provided further evidence for the hypothesis that HFOs and underlying conventional SEP components have different origins.