International journal of obstetric anesthesia
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialPain during elective caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia: the effect of a 10 degrees head-up tilt position.
One hundred patients scheduled for elective caesarean section under epidural anaesthesia were randomized to have epidural loading doses in either the horizontal or a 10 degrees head-up position. They were assigned to their position only after an initial dose of 4 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine had been given. Ten minutes after this dose they were given 10 ml of 0.5% bupivacaine and 50 microg of fentanyl in their allocated position. ⋯ The inter-quartile range was 0 to 2 for the head-up tilt position and 0 to 4 for the horizontal position (P<0.05). Position had no significant effect on the blood pressure or Bromage score. A 10 degrees head-up tilt position is useful during the establishment of epidural anaesthesia to reduce the pain experienced by the patient during caesarean section.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialRegional anaesthesia for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia: spinal anaesthesia is the preferred choice.
Standard textbooks advocate epidural rather than spinal anaesthesia for caesarean section in severe preeclampsia. The basis for this recommendation is the theoretical risk of severe hypotension but no published scientific studies have been identified to support this assertion. We therefore designed a prospective study to compare spinal versus epidural anaesthesia in severely pre-eclamptic patients requiring hypotensive therapy. ⋯ By contrast in the epidural group three patients had mild pain and four others had pain severe enough to warrant intraoperative analgesia. There were no differences in neonatal outcomes. These findings support recent studies suggesting the safety and efficacy of spinal anaesthesia in this group of patients.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Apr 1999
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialCentral neuraxial opioid analgesia after caesarean section: comparison of epidural diamorphine and intrathecal morphine.
In a prospective, randomized, double-blind study in 55 women undergoing elective caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia, we compared epidural diamorphine 3 mg (2 distinct boluses, group ED) with single-dose intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg (group SM), in terms of analgesic efficacy, patient satisfaction and side-effects at 2, 3, 4, 8, 12, 16, 24 and 28 h postoperatively. There were no significant differences between groups in pain (assessed by 100 mm visual analogue scale), incidence of pruritus, sedation or respiratory depression measured by continuous pulse oximetry. However, time to first request for supplementary oral analgesia was longer in SM than in ED (mean +/- SD: 22.3+/-12.0 h vs. 13.8+/-6.5 h, P=0.04). ⋯ In ED, the mean +/- SD time to requirement of the second bolus was 6.7+/-3.2 h. There was a high level of satisfaction in both groups. We conclude that two boluses of epidural diamorphine 3 mg and single-dose intrathecal morphine 0.2 mg provide satisfactory analgesia after caesarean section, but spinal morphine was associated with both delayed requirement for supplementary analgesia and a higher incidence of nausea and vomiting.