International journal of obstetric anesthesia
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 2001
A survey of epidural technique and accidental dural puncture rates among obstetric anaesthetists.
Five hundred UK obstetric anaesthetists were surveyed to investigate retrospectively the relationship between experience, rotation of the epidural needle within the epidural space, choice of loss-of-resistance agent and accidental dural puncture (ADP) rate. Responses were received from 390 (78%) of the members surveyed. Anaesthetists with more than 15 years' experience are more likely to perform an epidural with the patient in the lateral position (P < 0.001), use loss-of-resistance to air to detect the epidural space (P < 0.001) and rotate the epidural needle after identifying the epidural space (P = 0.001) when compared to those of less experience. ⋯ There are three components that can alter from case to case; patient positioning, loss-of-resistance agent and needle rotation. Loss-of-resistance agent and patient positioning in isolation did not significantly influence ADP rate. This study suggests that the combination of practising lateral patient positioning, loss-of-resistance to saline and non-rotation of the epidural needle significantly reduces ADP rate (P = 0.035).
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 2001
Long-term morbidity following dural puncture in an obstetric population.
Immediate and long-term symptoms, particularly headache, are recognised complications of dural puncture. To investigate long-term symptoms, a case-controlled retrospective questionnaire study was performed. The questionnaire was sent to 194 mothers who had suffered either accidental dural puncture during the placement of an epidural catheter or had developed a significant headache following spinal anaesthesia. ⋯ There was increased reporting of new long-term headache and neckache in the spinal study group and an increased reporting of new long-term backache in the accidental dural puncture group compared to the epidural controls. These symptoms had a significant impact upon the mother's daily life and in some instances lasted for years. Disappointingly, although epidural blood patching was beneficial in the short term, it failed to produce any reduction in the incidence of long-term symptoms.
-
Int J Obstet Anesth · Jan 2001
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical TrialA comparison of bupivacaine-fentanyl-morphine with bupivacaine-fentanyl-diamorphine for caesarean section under spinal anaesthesia.
In a randomised double-blind trial, postoperative analgesia and side effects of intrathecal morphine 0.1 mg and intrathecal diamorphine 0.25 mg were compared. Sixty women were randomised to receive intrathecal injection of 12.5 mg hyperbaric bupivacaine and 12.5 microg fentanyl with either morphine 0.1 mg (group M), or diamorphine 0.25 mg (group D). All women received 100 mg diclofenac rectally at the end of surgery and were given intravenous morphine via a patient controlled analgesia (PCA) system. ⋯ There was no significant difference between the groups in the number of women vomiting in the 24-h period. The two groups were comparable for pruritus and drowsiness. We conclude that 0.25 mg subarachnoid diamorphine is a suitable alternative to 0.1 mg morphine for post caesarean section analgesia.