The Annals of pharmacotherapy
-
While these preliminary results in humans seem promising, no large trials have been conducted to compare vasopressin and epinephrine in CPR. At this time, standard guidelines using epinephrine are still preferred.
-
Misoprostol is an effective agent for cervical ripening and induction of labor. The use of oxytocin was significantly decreased in patients treated with misoprostol versus dinoprostone. It has been used to induce over 1000 women in reported studies and has demonstrated a safety profile comparable with that of endocervical and vaginal dinoprostone. ⋯ Additional clinical experience should also help to determine the best regimen and method of administration. From the data currently available, it appears that either a 25- or 50-microgram dose (one-fourth or one-half of a 100-microgram tablet) inserted into the posterior vaginal fornix and repeated at 4-5-hour intervals if needed, is a clinically effective regimen, and is associated with the least amount of adverse effects and complications. As with all labor inductions, uterine contractions and fetal heart rate should be monitored carefully throughout the procedure.
-
Review Case Reports
Baclofen toxicity in patients with severely impaired renal function.
To report the toxic effects of baclofen in patients with severely impaired renal function. ⋯ Patients with severely impaired renal function generally develop baclofen intoxication soon after the initiation of low-dose therapy. Thus, the administration of baclofen, regardless of the dosage, in these patients is not appropriate. Abdominal pain, in addition to altered consciousness, is a common presenting feature in patients with renal failure who have baclofen intoxication. Hemodialysis is effective in alleviating the clinical symptoms and shortening the recovery time for such patients.
-
To evaluate the feasibility, safety, and efficacy of prehospital-initiated thrombolysis in decreasing the mortality rate due to acute myocardial infarction. ⋯ In clinical trials, prehospital-initiated thrombolytic therapy was shown to be safe and probably more effective than in-hospital administration of thrombolytic therapy, but this has not proven feasible in the US at this time. Despite time-savings by decreasing treatment delay with prehospital-initiated thrombolysis, patient delay still persists and accounts for the majority of delay. Future investigations will center on increasing the number of patients treated with thrombolytic agents through patient education, in-patient and out-patient programs that rapidly identify eligible patients, as well as prehospital diagnostic ECGs.