ASAIO journal : a peer-reviewed journal of the American Society for Artificial Internal Organs
-
Comparative Study
Long-term survival with use of percutaneous extracorporeal life support in patients presenting with acute myocardial infarction and cardiovascular collapse.
Up to 10% of patients who arrive at the hospital with acute myocardial infarction (AMI) present with or develop cardiogenic shock. Some patients, despite inotropes and intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) placement, are not hemodynamically stable enough to undergo emergent revascularization. The use of percutaneous extracorporeal life support (ECLS) can stabilize patients to allow effective therapy. ⋯ The average time on ECLS was 29 +/- 26 hours for the survivors and 30 +/-67 hours for the nonsurvivors (p = NS). Leg complications were common among long-term survivors, associated with the use of ECLS (three ischemia, one infection). After AMI and cardiovascular collapse, insertion of ECLS may permit long-term patient survival.
-
Comparative Study
Pulsatile and nonpulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of energy equivalent pressure during cardiopulmonary bypass for direct comparisons.
The purpose of this study was to quantify and compare pulsatile and nonpulsatile pressure and flow waveforms in terms of energy equivalent pressure (EEP) during cardiopulmonary bypass in a neonatal piglet model. EEP is the ratio of the area under the hemodynamic power curve and the flow curve. Piglets, mean weight of 3 kg, were used in physiologic pulsatile pump (n = 7), pulsatile roller pump (n = 6), and nonpulsatile roller pump (n = 7) groups. ⋯ Although there was no difference in mean pressures in all groups, EEP and the percentage increase of pressure (from mean pressure to EEP) of mean arterial pressure and preaortic cannula extracorporeal circuit pressure were higher with pulsatile perfusion compared with nonpulsatile perfusion (p < 0.001). In particular, the physiologic pulsatile pump group produced significantly higher hemodynamic energy compared with the other groups (p < 0.001). These results suggest that pulsatile and nonpulsatile flows can be quantified in terms of EEP for direct comparisons, and pulsatile flow generates higher energy, which may be beneficial for vital organ perfusion during cardiopulmonary bypass.