Disability and rehabilitation
-
To translate, culturally adapt, and validate the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire into Yoruba language. ⋯ The mean age of the respondents was 53.6 ± 11.6 years. The internal consistency of the Yoruba language version of the Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire yielded a Cronbach's alpha of 0.9. Principal component analysis yielded a three-factor structure including the "work", "beliefs related to work", and "physical activity" which accounted for 61.6% of variance in the Yoruba translation. Test-retest reliability of the Yoruba translation yielded an Intra class correlation coefficient 0.97 (0.95-0.98). The Yoruba Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire was poorly correlated with the Visual Analog Scale (r = 0.01) and Roland-Morris Disability Questionnaire (r = 0.3). The minimal detectable difference of the Yoruba translation was 7.0. The Yoruba Fear Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire demonstrated excellent psychometric properties similar to existing versions and is appropriate for clinical use among Yoruba-speaking patients.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire is a culturally sensitive psychosocial outcome measure, necessitating its existence, and adaptation into different languages.The instrument was translated and culturally adapted into the Yoruba language following the Guillemin criteria.The Yoruba translation demonstrated excellent internal consistency, test-retest reliability and weak correlations with the Visual analog scale and Roland-Morris Disability Scale.The Yoruba version of the Fear-Avoidance Beliefs Questionnaire can be used to assess fear-avoidance beliefs among Yoruba speaking patients with low-back pain.
-
Little attention has been paid to psychosocial factors in Joint Hypermobility Syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome (hypermobility type). This study sought to identify the psychosocial impact by examining participants' lived experiences; and identify characteristics of effective coping. ⋯ The results highlight the significant psychosocial impact on participants' lives. Coping approaches identified included acceptance, building social networks, learning about joint hypermobility, and adapting activities. Physiotherapists supported regular exercise. Further research should consider potential interventions to improve information provision, address psychological support, and increase awareness of hypermobility among healthcare professionals.Implications for rehabilitationParticipants who had help from family members to complete activities described guilt and shame, highlighting the need for a greater rehabilitation focus on maintaining independence.Difficulties with sexual relationships due to prolapse or erectile dysfunction, and associated anxieties have indicated a need for greater awareness of these issues within primary care.The provision of reliable information and materials is vital, both for healthcare professionals and patients, to reduce misinformation and fear.Physiotherapists with knowledge of Joint Hypermobility Syndrome and Ehlers-Danlos Syndrome hypermobility type were cited as sources of support and hope, which helped people to cope with and manage their condition.
-
WHODAS 2.0 is a unified scale to measuring disability across diseases, countries, and cultures. The objective was to explore the available evidence on the psychometric properties of 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0 among a general population and people with non-acute physical causes of disability. ⋯ It seems, that the 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0 is internally consistent and a reliable scale demonstrating overall good correlation with other measures of disability. However, it appears that it is a multidimensional scale and its total score may represent different combinations of several contributing factors. Thus, the 12-item WHODAS 2.0 can be more reliable when creating a person's functional profile formed by the 12 individual item scores instead of a single total sum.IMPLICATIONS FOR REHABILITATIONThe 12-item self-administered WHODAS 2.0 is internally consistent and a reliable scale demonstrating overall good correlation with other measures of disability.It appears that it is a multidimensional scale and its total score may represent different combinations of several contributing factors.The 12-item WHODAS 2.0 can be more reliable when creating a person's functional profile formed by the 12 individual item scores instead of a single total sum.