European journal of cancer care
-
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) · Sep 2012
End-of-life preferences in advanced cancer patients willing to discuss issues surrounding their terminal condition.
The aim of the present study is to describe end-of-life preferences of advanced cancer patients willing to talk about death issues. Eighty-eight advanced cancer patients were interviewed through End of Life Preferences Interview (ELPI), a 23-item interview covering a wide range of end-of-life care issues. Most interviewed subjects were home care patients and their median survival after ELPI administration was 69 days. ⋯ Approximately 67% choose home as the preferred place of death and 63% think it is preferable to die in a state of unconsciousness induced by drugs. About half of responders declare to believe in any kind of life after death and 40% consider very important to find any meaning at the end of life. ELPI can be a useful instrument to adapt the model of care to the specific needs and values of each patient.
-
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) · Sep 2012
ReviewNutritional support and quality of life in cancer patients undergoing palliative care.
In palliative care, the nutrition provided has to be tailored to the patient's needs, enhancing patient comfort and quality of life (QoL). We conducted a literature search to review methods of measuring QoL, and modalities of nutritional intervention and their influence on QoL of cancer patients in palliative care. Original papers published in English were selected from PubMed database by using the search terms, palliative medicine, cancer, nutrition and quality of life. ⋯ Nutritional status should be assessed early and regularly during treatment using appropriate tools. In the particularly acute context of palliative care, optimal patient management requires adequate education and counselling to patients and families. Meaningful interactions between the patient, caregivers and medical team would also increase the chance of resolving nutrition-related issues and help to fulfil each patient's specific nutritional needs and thus improve the QoL.
-
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) · Sep 2012
Advanced cancer patients' self-assessed physical and emotional problems on admission and discharge from hospital general wards--a questionnaire study.
Most cancer patients receiving life-prolonging or palliative treatment are offered non-specialist palliative services. There is a lack of knowledge about their problem profile. The aim of this article is to describe the incidence of patient-reported physical and emotional problems on admission and discharge from general hospital wards and health staff's reported intervention. ⋯ A Wilcoxon signed rank test showed significant change in mean score for six out of nine problem areas, but the majority of the patients did not move to the lower intensity category. The highest concurrence was between patient-reported problems and reported intervention for physical function, pain, constipation and loss of appetite. Palliative cancer patients' self-reported problem profile on admission and discharge from hospital has not previously been described and the results indicate a need to focus on improvements to palliative services and for a special service for pain and constipation that could prevent some admissions.
-
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl) · Sep 2012
Is it useful to calculate sum scores of the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30?
The aim of this paper is to test the psychometric properties of sum scores of the quality of life questionnaire EORTC QLQ-C30. A sample of cancer patients (n= 1529) and a sample of the general population (n= 1185) were tested with the EORTC QLQ-C30, the Hospital Anxiety and Depression Scale and the Multidimensional Fatigue Inventory. Three sum scores of the EORTC QLQ-C30 are defined: a score concerning functioning, a score concerning symptoms and a total score. ⋯ Cronbach's alpha of the total score is 0.94 (cancer patients) and 0.95 (general population). The effect size discriminating between patients and controls is d= 0.83 for the total score, compared to only 0.50 obtained with the two-item quality of life scale. The results prove that the calculation of sum scores provides useful information for clinicians who are interested in one generalising score of quality of life.