Seizure : the journal of the British Epilepsy Association
-
Review Meta Analysis
Nocebo effect in refractory partial epilepsy during pre-surgical monitoring: Systematic review and meta-analysis of placebo-controlled clinical trials.
Nocebo is very prevalent among neurological diseases resulting in low adherence and treatment outcome. We sought to examine the AEs following placebo administration in Randomized Controlled Studies (RCTs) for Epilepsy. ⋯ Very limited epilepsy RCTs with pure placebo groups are available and all are in treatment resistant patients during pre-surgical monitoring. However, our study indicates a significant nocebo effect in trials for epilepsy treatment adversely affecting adherence and efficacy of current treatments in clinical practice, with additional implications for trial designing.
-
There is concern about the safety of anesthetic drugs (IVADs) in the management of status epilepticus (SE). To clarify this aspect, we aimed to assess the factors associated with a poor prognosis in SE requiring anesthetics. ⋯ Lengthy duration of SE in patients requiring IVADs is associated with a poorer prognosis and death. A STESS ≥3 and the etiology seem mainly related to the functional status at discharge, whereas more severely impaired consciousness and complications during sedation are related to mortality.
-
Posttraumatic epileptic seizures (PTS) are a serious complication in patients with subdural haematoma (SDH). However, to date, several studies have shown discordances about SDH-associated seizures in terms of incidence, risk factors and prophylactic antiepileptic treatment. ⋯ PTS are a serious complication in patients with SDH, particularly in aSDH. The "prophylactic use" of antiepileptic drugs might be beneficial in patients with cumulative risk factors.
-
Perampanel (PER) and lacosamide (LCM) are antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) approved for the adjunctive treatment of partial-onset seizures. At the time of market entry, information on clinical effectiveness of new AEDs is limited to results from pivotal trials, real-life or comparative data are missing. This analysis of data collected retrospectively in a German epilepsy center used unified evaluation criteria, and describes treatment outcomes with LCM and PER at 6 months. ⋯ This analysis describes initial comparative benefits of two newly available AEDs in two cohorts of patients with highly refractory epilepsies. Responder and seizure freedom rates were numerically higher for PER. The analysis suggests that new AEDs can provide a chance for seizure freedom in relevant subgroups of patients, despite previous failure of multiple AEDs.