The American surgeon
-
The American surgeon · Jan 1994
A prospective reappraisal of primary repair of penetrating duodenal injuries.
Based on a retrospective analysis of 100 penetrating duodenal injuries, the role of primary repair or resection and anastomosis was assessed prospectively in 66 patients (1986-1992). Duodenal exclusion was reserved for extensive combined pancreato-duodenal injuries. Seven of the 66 patients died from extensive abdominal trauma (mean Abdominal Trauma Index, ATI 70) within 48 hours of admission. ⋯ We conclude that the vast majority of penetrating duodenal injuries should be managed by primary repair or resection and anastomosis. Complex duodenal decompression or diverticulization rarely are necessary. Complex procedures should be considered for patients with ATI > 40, Duodenal Injury Score > 12, and the presence of injury to the head of the pancreas.
-
Breast cancer treatment has undergone significant changes in concept, concurrent with alterations in our understanding of cancer biology and natural history. Within the last 10 years, oncologists have brought into question the traditional Halstedian concepts of the natural history of breast cancer and its appropriate management. The goal of treatment, once a primary cancer is detected in the breast, is to prevent metastasis and subsequent death of the patient. ⋯ Follow-up analysis of the 110 women treated in "standard fashion" was complete in 88 patients 1 to 8 years post-treatment (mean 56 months). Cumulative overall survival was 82 per cent and disease-free survival 83 per cent. Local recurrence was noted in five per cent.(ABSTRACT TRUNCATED AT 250 WORDS)
-
The ability to predict amputation following combined orthopedic, vascular and soft tissue trauma to an extremity could eliminate prolonged attempts at salvage of a doomed limb. We reviewed our experience with 48 mangled lower extremities in 46 patients. Twenty-one penetrating wounds and 25 blunt injuries occurred in 37 men and nine women ranging in age from 3 to 59 years. ⋯ Severe extremity injuries require a coordinated approach and decisions regarding amputation require careful judgement. These decisions cannot always be made at the time of presentation or during the initial operation. If after revascularization and skeletal stabilization the extremity is clearly nonviable or remains insensate, then delayed amputation can be performed under more controlled circumstances.
-
Fluid resuscitation is considered to be an integral component of the management of hemorrhagic shock. Numerous experimental studies of hypovolemic shock have confirmed the value of volume infusions, but in these models the rate, volume, and duration of bleeding are carefully controlled. The results of such studies may not be applicable to clinical hemorrhage, in which bleeding continues unabated. ⋯ Animals that received either lactated Ringer's or hetastarch had more bleeding into the peritoneal cavity and a greater dilution of clotting factors than animals that received no resuscitation fluids (P < 0.05). In addition, survival was highest in unresuscitated animals, although only the small volume hetastarch group had a significantly lower survival when independently compared with no resuscitation (P < 0.05). These results suggest that in traumatic shock, fluid resuscitation should be minimized until mechanical control of bleeding can be achieved.