The American surgeon
-
The American surgeon · Feb 1997
Comparative StudyThe role of ultrasonography in blunt abdominal trauma: a prospective study.
The evaluation of blunt abdominal trauma (BAT) can be difficult because of the subtle manifestations of the injuries and because assessment is hampered by altered neurologic status. Short of laparotomy, CT and diagnostic peritoneal lavage provided the best means of accurately diagnosing intra-abdominal injury. Ultrasound (US) has recently been introduced into trauma centers in the United States as a quick, cheap, and safe method to make the diagnosis of BAT. ⋯ Overall, US was 88 per cent sensitive, 98 per cent specific, and 96 per cent accurate in diagnosing intra-abdominal injuries. There were no operative sequelae to patients whose injury was missed by US. We conclude that: 1) US can be used as the initial method of diagnosis of BAT and 2) surgeons are able to perform the examination accurately.
-
The American surgeon · Feb 1997
Comparative StudyRandomized blinded study of aprotinin infusion for liver crush injuries in the pig model.
Repeat exploratory laparotomies for intra-abdominal bleeding in patients who sustain severe blunt intra-abdominal trauma are common. Reexploration usually reveals no single site of bleeding and the abdomen is closed with laparotomy pad packing, with a presumed diagnosis of coagulopathy. ⋯ The liver plays a major role in the balance of hemostatic systems, and this balance is disrupted by liver trauma. This study investigates the use of intravenous aprotinin, a naturally occurring serine protease inhibitor, in a pig liver crush model to evaluate its effectiveness in reducing intra-abdominal bleeding in experimentally induced shock and non-shock states.
-
Since 1990, a selective management algorithm has been used in our Trauma Center to treat 91 patients with penetrating neck injuries. Group A (n = 37) sustained zone I, zone III, or multiple-zone injuries; Group B (n = 54) sustained zone II injuries [most (55, 66.4%) from gunshot or shotgun wounds]. Nineteen Group A and 21 Group B patients required mandatory neck exploration. ⋯ Unnecessary exploration was avoided in 52 per cent of cases regardless of the location of the wound. Mortality and morbidity rates were acceptable. Patients with penetrating neck injuries could be safely managed selectively regardless of the injury zone.
-
In patients with inferior vena cava (IVC) injuries, predictors of survival are investigated. From 1987 to 1995, 27 IVC injuries were identified among 514 patients with vascular trauma. The ability of clinical determinants to predict survival were retrospectively assessed. ⋯ Four complications [venous hypertension (n = 2), IVC thrombosis (n = 1), and pulmonary embolus (n = 1)] occurred in the 14 survivors (28.6%). Blunt injury, revised trauma score, free perforation, injury location, intraoperative hypotension, and blood loss were predictive of mortality. IVC injuries remain extremely lethal, and improved survival is associated with infrarenal penetrating injuries and a contained hematoma.
-
The American surgeon · Feb 1997
Primary repair of 58 consecutive penetrating injuries of the colon: should colostomy be abandoned?
Although primary repair of penetrating colon injuries in patients with low injury severity is now widely accepted, several "risk factors" continue to be viewed as relative contraindications to this method of management. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the septic complications and leak rate in a series of consecutive penetrating colon injuries managed exclusively with primary repair. The records of 58 consecutive patients with penetrating intra-abdominal colon injuries managed at an urban Level I trauma center from July 1991 to December 1995 were reviewed. ⋯ The presence of "risk factors" appeared to identify more severely injured patients as indicated by a higher mean PATI score and a higher incidence of intra-abdominal abscess, when compared to patients in whom the "risk factor" was absent. Primary repair can safely be used for virtually all penetrating colon injuries, as clinical leaks are rare, even in patients with "risk factors". Intra-abdominal abscess and other septic complications are dependent on the overall severity of the intra-abdominal injuries and probably result from contamination occurring at the time of injury rather than from postoperative leak from the primary repair.