The American surgeon
-
The American surgeon · Jan 2011
Comparative StudyCivilian and military trauma: does civilian training prepare surgeons for the battlefield?
The management of trauma patients continues to be a major focus of resident training. The purpose of this review is to compare the mechanism and distribution of injuries in civilian and military trauma and to ascertain whether we are optimally preparing surgeons for the injuries seen on the battlefield. We performed a retrospective 5-year review of all trauma admissions to our urban trauma center (TC). ⋯ Truncal injuries accounted for just 14 per cent of the injuries seen and extremity injuries accounted for, a significant, 56 per cent of all the injuries observed. The civilian experience with gunshot wounds often focuses on truncal trauma, yet the military data show a need for knowledge of devastating injuries to the extremity. This divergent experience may be even more salient in the future as the battlefield is brought closer to home through domestic terrorism and the line is blurred between military and civilian trauma.
-
Left pancreatic traumas (LPTs) are rare but serious lesions occurring in 1 to 6 per cent of abdominal trauma patients and mainly resulting from blunt traumas. LPT severity is primarily dependent on the associated injuries and secondarily related to main pancreatic duct injury responsible for complications: acute pancreatitis, pseudocysts, pancreatic fistulas, or abscesses. The guidelines for blunt LPT management can be presented as follows. ⋯ However, in such cases, spleen-preserving distal pancreatectomy remains the treatment of choice. Pancreatic ductal lesions resulting from LPT have to be diagnosed early to avoid late complications. Distal pancreatectomy remains the treatment of choice in case of severe pancreatic ductal lesions because the role of ERCP stenting and endoscopic techniques needs further evaluation.
-
The American surgeon · Jan 2011
Comparative StudyStatins and the bariatric patient: characterization and perioperative effects of statin therapy in the gastric bypass patient.
In surgical patients, statins have been shown to have beneficial effects independent of the lipid-lowering properties. Statin use has not been well studied in the bariatric patient. The objective of this study was to characterize the use of statins in the bariatric surgery patient and compare outcomes, including complications, weight loss, and changes in comorbidities. ⋯ The statin group was more likely to report resolution in HLD (27.5 vs 9.5%, P = 0.004), but not DM, HTN, or OSA. In summary, there are differences in bariatric patients who take statins compared with their counterparts. Statins with gastric bypass may improve resolution of HLD, which may eventually alter long-term cardiac risk in these patients.
-
The American surgeon · Jan 2011
Comparative StudyComparison of blood transfusion free pancreaticoduodenectomy to transfusion-eligible pancreaticoduodenectomy.
Even though the surgical techniques and perioperative care have improved, blood transfusions are still often required for the patients undergoing pancreaticoduodenectomy (PD). But complications from blood transfusions, poor prognosis of blood transfused patients, cost, and availability of blood products demand transfusion free (TF) surgery in the PD patients. The purpose of this study is to compare clinical outcome of TF pancreaticoduodenectomy with transfusion-eligible (TE) PD. ⋯ The results of statistical analysis between TF and TE group showed that there were no statistical differences in intraoperative data and postoperative outcomes, except preoperative hemoglobin levels, type of operations, and transfusion amount. To our best knowledge, this is the first successful PD program in selected patients as a series of operations without blood transfusion. TF PD can be done successfully in selected patients without severe complications.
-
The American surgeon · Jan 2011
Comparative StudyCT with coronal reconstruction identifies previously missed smaller diaphragmatic injuries after blunt trauma.
Diaphragmatic injuries (DIs) are difficult to diagnose and often go unrecognized after blunt trauma. We proposed that CT scan with coronal reconstruction (CTCR) improves the detection of small DIs missed by chest x-ray (CXR) and CT scan with axial views (CTAX). We performed a retrospective review at a Level I trauma center from 2001 to 2006 and identified 35 patients who underwent operative repair of DI after blunt trauma. ⋯ The mean DI size identified by CTCR was significantly smaller than that identified by CXR alone (4.6 cm vs 9.7 cm, P < 0.05) and by CXR and CTAX (4.6 cm vs 10.6 cm, P < 0.0005). CTCR improves the ability to detect smaller DI defects (4 to 8 cm) that were previously missed by CXR and CTAX. CTAX adds little to CXR alone for the diagnosis of large defects (greater than 8 cm).