Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A double-blind comparison of epidural ketamine and diamorphine for postoperative analgesia.
Twenty patients who had abdominal hysterectomy under general anaesthesia were randomly assigned to receive either epidural ketamine (30 mg), or epidural diamorphine (5 mg) peri-operatively and on first request for analgesia. Failure to obtain satisfactory analgesia with one of the agents was treated by epidural administration of the other. Pain was assessed by an independent observer, and by the patient using a visual analogue scale. ⋯ The mean (SD) time to first request for analgesia was 272 (206) and 72 (41) minutes in the diamorphine and ketamine groups respectively (p less than 0.01). All patients in the diamorphine group obtained adequate analgesia, but all patients in the ketamine group were changed to epidural diamorphine. Epidural ketamine does not appear to be a sufficiently effective alternative to epidural diamorphine for routine use in postoperative pain.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
A comparison between open-end (single hole) and closed-end (three lateral holes) epidural catheters. Complications and quality of sensory blockade.
A randomised, single-blind study was conducted on 802 parturient women who required epidural analgesia, to compare open-end (single hole) with closed-end (three lateral holes) epidural catheters. The complication rate after catheter insertion was not statistically different between the two groups, but the number of unsatisfactory blocks was significantly higher in the open-end group (p less than 0.001). ⋯ This resulted in a significantly higher number of open-end catheters that required replacement (p less than 0.001). Open-end catheters despite their theoretical advantages in the detection of intravenous and subarachnoid placement caused an unacceptably high incidence of unsatisfactory sensory blockade.
-
Comparative Study
The pressor response and laryngeal mask insertion. A comparison with tracheal intubation.
The pressor response associated with laryngoscopy and tracheal intubation may be harmful to certain patients. The laryngeal mask airway avoids the need for laryngoscopy and allows positive pressure ventilation of the lungs in appropriate patients. ⋯ We have shown a similar, but attenuated pattern of response associated with mask insertion in comparison with laryngoscopy and intubation; significant differences between the groups were evident in arterial diastolic blood pressure immediately after insertion and again 2 minutes later. Use of the laryngeal mask may therefore offer some limited advantages over tracheal intubation in the anaesthetic management of patients where the avoidance of the pressor response is of particular concern.
-
Five young women, all of whom had anaphylactic responses in operating units, are described. Three of them worked in a hospital three showed immediate hypersensitivity to fruit and all had known urticaria to latex. Anaphylaxis appeared progressively 15 to 30 minutes after injection of anaesthetic drugs. ⋯ Skin prick tests through gloves and with four different allergen preparations (saline which had been incubated with gloves and three kinds of latex) were positive. Human basophil degranulation tests with all four allergens were positive and radio allergo sorbent tests to latex were also positive. IgE-dependent allergy to latex may be investigated by questionnaire and if necessary by prick tests before each operation to prevent anaphylaxis due to surgical gloves.