Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Protamine--the need to determine the dose. Comparison of a simple protamine titration method with an empirical dose regimen for reversal of heparinisation following cardiopulmonary bypass.
A simple method of protamine titration using the Hemochron system was compared with an empirical dose protocol for reversal of heparinisation following cardiopulmonary bypass in 40 patients undergoing elective myocardial revascularisation. Protamine titration revealed a wide range for protamine requirement and resulted in a significant reduction in protamine dose compared with the empirical dose protocol (p less than 0.01). Heparin reversal was assessed as adequate in all patients. The titration technique was easy and straightforward to use in the operating theatre.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Clinical Trial
Pain following thoracotomy. A randomised, double-blind comparison of lumbar versus thoracic epidural fentanyl.
Fifty-eight patients scheduled for elective thoracotomy were randomly allocated to receive fentanyl by either the thoracic or the lumbar epidural route for postoperative analgesia. The infusion rate was adjusted to optimise analgesia. ⋯ In addition, there was no significant difference in dose requirements or incidence of side effects between the two groups. There appears little justification for the use of the generally less familiar, and potentially more dangerous, thoracic approach when fentanyl alone is infused into the epidural space following thoracotomy.
-
An acute episode of a malignant hyperthermia-like syndrome is described which occurred after suxamethonium and isoflurane anaesthesia in a 41-year-old healthy male patient undergoing a minor elective hand operation. Dantrolene therapy rapidly reversed the life-threatening signs. Laboratory results appeared to confirm the suspicion of malignant hyperthermia. However, the in vitro contracture test, which was carried out according to the standards of the European Malignant Hyperthermia Group, was equivocal.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Analgesic efficacy of controlled-release dihydrocodeine. A comparison of 60, 90 and 120 mg tablets in cold-induced pain.
A prospective, double-blind, single-dose placebo-controlled four-part crossover study of 12 healthy volunteers was carried out to compare the analgesic efficacy of controlled-release dihydrocodeine tablets 60, 90 and 120 mg (DHC Continus tablets, Napp Laboratories) in cold-induced pain. Subjects received each of the four treatments in a random order using a latin square design. On each of the four study days, the volunteers performed cold pressor tests, before dose and again at 4, 8 and 12 hours after dose. ⋯ At 4 hours there was a significant reduction in pain in subjects who received 120 mg or 90 mg tablets compared with placebo, and in subjects who received 120 mg tablets compared with those who received 60 mg tablets. At 8 hours, 120 mg and 90 mg dihydrocodeine were still better than placebo. There was no significant difference in side effects between treatments.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Acid aspiration prophylaxis in morbidly obese patients: famotidine vs. ranitidine.
Famotidine and ranitidine were compared as agents for the prevention of acid aspiration syndrome in 32 morbidly obese patients undergoing vertical banded gastroplasty. Single-dose oral famotidine or double-dose oral ranitidine were administered on a random basis before surgery. Gastric contents were aspirated through a gastric tube, manually aided by the surgeon with the abdomen open. ⋯ Mean (SD) gastric pH values were 6.2 (1.5) and 6.8 (1.5), respectively. There were no significant differences between the groups and no patient was considered 'at risk' (pH less than 2.5 and gastric volume greater than 25 ml). We conclude that single-dose oral famotidine and double-dose oral ranitidine are equally effective for preventing acid aspiration syndrome in morbidly obese patients.