Anaesthesia
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Epidural bupivacaine dilution for labour. A comparison of three concentrations infused with a fixed dose of fentanyl.
We have compared the effects of three epidural infusions in a randomised, double-blind study of 56 primigravid mothers in labour. An initial dose of bupivacaine 0.5% 8 ml was followed by infusion of either bupivacaine 0.125%, 0.062% or 0.031%. ⋯ Women receiving the most dilute solution had significantly less analgesia (p less than 0.001) for the first 4 hours of the study, but pain scores were then similar for the three groups. No obvious benefit was gained by using very dilute bupivacaine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Morphine compared with diamorphine. A comparison of dose requirements and side-effects after hip surgery.
The dose requirements and side effects of morphine were compared with those of diamorphine administered by patient-controlled analgesia in 40 patients following elective total hip replacement. Patients were allocated randomly to receive in a double-blind manner either morphine or diamorphine for postoperative pain relief. There were no significant differences between the two groups with regard to postoperative sedation, nausea, well-being, pain relief and requirements for antiemetic drugs. The dose requirement for diamorphine was approximately 50% of that for morphine.
-
Randomized Controlled Trial Comparative Study Clinical Trial
Intra-operative patient-controlled sedation. Comparison of patient-controlled propofol with anaesthetist-administered midazolam and fentanyl.
The quality of sedation and postoperative recovery have been assessed for intra-operative sedation provided by either patient-controlled sedation with propofol or a standard method using divided doses of midazolam and fentanyl, in 40 ASA 1 day surgery patients undergoing extraction of third molar teeth under local analgesia. Patient-controlled sedation with propofol produced sedation no deeper than full eyelid closure with prompt response to verbal command, but deeper levels were seen in three patients in the midazolam and fentanyl group. Patient satisfaction was higher in the patient-controlled sedation propofol group for both subjective intra-operative feelings (p less than 0.01) and willingness to have the procedure again in the same manner (p less than 0.05). ⋯ Drug dose was correlated with duration of procedure and surgical difficulty in the patient-controlled sedation propofol group but not in the midazolam and fentanyl group. Postoperative testing included a new computerised test, the FAST index, which indicated a dose-dependent reduction in cognitive function in the midazolam and fentanyl group, which persisted until the time of discharge. Changes in cognitive function in the patient-controlled sedation propofol group in the same postoperative interval were significantly less and not related to propofol dose.
-
The relationship between peak airway pressure, alveolar pressure and respiratory frequency was calculated for the range of compliances and airway resistances which might be encountered during mechanical ventilation of a 3-kg neonate. The pressure/flow relationships of 2.5, 3.0, 3.5 and 4-mm tracheal tubes were determined at a series of flows from 0.5 to 4 litres/minute. ⋯ Large differences between peak airway and alveolar pressures developed when frequency was increased or inspiratory time decreased; the differences were greatest with the smaller tubes. Shortening expiratory time by increasing the frequency or altering the inspiratory:expiratory ratio resulted in increased end-expiratory pressure because of incomplete emptying of the lung.